Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] media: dt-bindings: ov5693: document YAML binding

[Tommaso Merciai]

Hi Sakari,

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 05:35:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Tommaso, Krzysztof,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 08:52:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 13/07/2022 08:48, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 04:29:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:33:48 +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > >>> Add documentation of device tree in YAML schema for the OV5693
> > > >>> CMOS image sensor from Omnivision
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> Changes since v1:
> > > >>>  - Fix allOf position as suggested by Krzysztof
> > > >>>  - Remove port description as suggested by Krzysztof
> > > >>>  - Fix EOF as suggested by Krzysztof
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Changes since v2:
> > > >>>  - Fix commit body as suggested by Krzysztof
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Changes since v3:
> > > >>>  - Add reviewed-by tags, suggested by Jacopo, Krzysztof
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Changes since v4:
> > > >>>  - Remove wrong Sakari reviewed-by tag, suggested by Krzysztof, Sakari
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Changes since v5:
> > > >>>  - Remove dovdd-supply, avdd-supply, dvdd-supply from required properties
> > > >>> as suggested by Jacopo
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml       | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
> > > >>>  2 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
> > > >>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > > >> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > > >>
> > > >> yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > >>
> > > >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > >> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.example.dtb: camera@36: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('port' was unexpected)
> > > >> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml
> > > >>
> > > >> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> > > >>
> > > >> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
> > > >>
> > > >> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> > > >> series is generally the most recent rc1.
> > > >>
> > > >> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> > > >> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> > > >> date:
> > > >>
> > > >> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> > > >>
> > > >> Please check and re-submit.
> > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > I run:
> > > > 
> > > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> > > > 
> > > > Then I check .yaml using:
> > > > 
> > > > make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml
> > > > DTEX    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.example.dts
> > > > LINT    Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> > > > CHKDT   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > > SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> > > > DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.example.dtb
> > > > CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.example.dtb
> > > > 
> > > > No error on my side. I'm missing something?
> > > 
> > > Rob's check are running newer dtschema, from master branch. The error he
> > > reports is about missing port, although I thought it is coming from
> > > video-interface-devices.
> > 
> > Hi Krzysztof, 
> > Thanks for the info! :)
> 
> These bindings are indeed missing the port node, please add one. See e.g.
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov02a10.yaml for an
> example.
> 
> The reason why video-interfaces and video-interface-device are sparate is
> because they deal with different nodes (device vs. port).

Thanks, sent v7.

Tommaso

> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Sakari Ailus

-- 
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________

Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.amarulasolutions.com