Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] riscv: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump

From: Xianting Tian
Date: Thu Jul 14 2022 - 07:06:15 EST



在 2022/7/14 下午5:46, Heiko Stübner 写道:
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2022, 11:17:26 CEST schrieb Xianting Tian:
在 2022/7/14 下午4:24, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 4:59 AM Xianting Tian
<xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As MODULES is only defined for CONFIG_64BIT, so we dump it when
CONFIG_64BIT.
Doesn't this cause a compile-time error on 32-bit?
I tested, rv32 compile is OK.
(unsigned long)VMEMMAP_END);
print_ml("vmalloc", (unsigned long)VMALLOC_START,
(unsigned long)VMALLOC_END);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
+ print_ml("modules", (unsigned long)MODULES_VADDR,
+ (unsigned long)MODULES_END);
The IS_ENABLED() check prevents the line from getting executed, but
unlike an #ifdef it still relies on it to be parsable.
Thanks, I will use #ifdef instead of IS_ENABLED
Patch1 also has that issue with the
thanks, I will modify it in V3.

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR);
vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END);
....


module_alloc falls back to a weak variant [0] which is the same as the riscv variant
only then using VMALLOC_START - VMALLOC_END as range, as the riscv-variant
conditional to CONFIG_64BIT.

yes, I ever checked, actually before 5.13, it doesn't define MODULES area but use VMALLOC for modules,

crash> mod
     MODULE       NAME           BASE           SIZE  OBJECT FILE
ffffffdf8167f280  galcore  ffffffdf81646000  3075841  (not loaded)  [CONFIG_KALLSYMS]

[    0.000000]      vmalloc : 0xffffffd000000000 - 0xffffffdfffffffff   (65535 MB)


I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier in the long run to just define
MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END for 32bit to use these values and get rid of
the CONFIG_64BIT ifdef we already have for MODULES (and new ones we are
introducing now).


Heiko


[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/module.c#L2835