Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: Fix MAX_DMA_ADDRESS overflow

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Mon Jul 18 2022 - 08:53:35 EST


On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 1:28 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/6/22 13:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Commit 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> > added a check to determine whether arm_dma_zone_size is exceeding the
> > amount of kernel virtual address space available between the upper 4GB
> > virtual address limit and PAGE_OFFSET in order to provide a suitable
> > definition of MAX_DMA_ADDRESS that should fit within the 32-bit virtual
> > address space. The quantity used for comparison was off by a missing
> > trailing 0, leading to MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to be overflowing a 32-bit
> > quantity.
> >
> > This was caught thanks to CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL on the bcm2711 platform
> > where we define a dma_zone_size of 1GB and we have a PAGE_OFFSET value
> > of 0xc000_0000 (CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G) leading to MAX_DMA_ADDRESS being
> > 0x1_0000_0000 which overflows the unsigned long type used throughout
> > __pa() and then __virt_addr_valid(). Because the virtual address passed
> > to __virt_addr_valid() would now be 0, the function would loudly warn
> > and flood the kernel log, thus making the platform unable to boot
> > properly.
> >
> > Fixes: 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Shall I send this to RMK's patch system?

I think so!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij