[PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Change the casting about jited_ksyms and jited_linfo

From: Pu Lehui
Date: Mon Jul 18 2022 - 08:59:38 EST


We have unified data extension operation of jited_ksyms and jited_linfo
into zero extension [0], so there's no need to cast __u64 memory address
to long data type. And __u64 in some arch is unsigned long, so to avoid
compiler warnings we just cast them to unsigned long long.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220530092815.1112406-2-pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index e852a9df779d..db10fa1745d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -6613,8 +6613,9 @@ static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
}

if (CHECK(jited_linfo[0] != jited_ksyms[0],
- "jited_linfo[0]:%lx != jited_ksyms[0]:%lx",
- (long)(jited_linfo[0]), (long)(jited_ksyms[0]))) {
+ "jited_linfo[0]:%llx != jited_ksyms[0]:%llx",
+ (unsigned long long)(jited_linfo[0]),
+ (unsigned long long)(jited_ksyms[0]))) {
err = -1;
goto done;
}
@@ -6632,16 +6633,17 @@ static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
}

if (CHECK(jited_linfo[i] <= jited_linfo[i - 1],
- "jited_linfo[%u]:%lx <= jited_linfo[%u]:%lx",
- i, (long)jited_linfo[i],
- i - 1, (long)(jited_linfo[i - 1]))) {
+ "jited_linfo[%u]:%llx <= jited_linfo[%u]:%llx",
+ i, (unsigned long long)jited_linfo[i],
+ i - 1, (unsigned long long)(jited_linfo[i - 1]))) {
err = -1;
goto done;
}

if (CHECK(jited_linfo[i] - cur_func_ksyms > cur_func_len,
- "jited_linfo[%u]:%lx - %lx > %u",
- i, (long)jited_linfo[i], (long)cur_func_ksyms,
+ "jited_linfo[%u]:%llx - %llx > %u",
+ i, (unsigned long long)jited_linfo[i],
+ (unsigned long long)cur_func_ksyms,
cur_func_len)) {
err = -1;
goto done;
--
2.25.1