Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal/core: Build ascending ordered indexes for the trip points

[Daniel Lezcano]

Hi Zhang,

thanks for the review

On 18/07/2022 07:28, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 23:09 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

[ ... ]

> > Instead of taking the risk of breaking the existing platforms, use an
> > array of temperature ordered trip identifiers and make it available
> > for the code needing to browse the trip points in an ordered way.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---

[ ... ]

> > +static void sort_trips_indexes(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> > +{
> > +       int i, j;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < tz->trips; i++)
> > +               tz->trips_indexes[i] = i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < tz->trips; i++) {
> > +               for (j = i + 1; j < tz->trips; j++) {
> > +                       int t1, t2;
> > +
> > +                       tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, tz-
> > > trips_indexes[i], &t1);
>
> This line can be moved to the upper loop.

Right, thanks!

> > +                       tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, tz-
> > > trips_indexes[j], &t2);
> > +
>
> what about the disabled trip points?
>
> we should ignore those trip points and check the return value to make
> sure we're comparing the valid trip_temp values.

We don't have to care about, whatever the position, the corresponding 
trip id will be disabled by the trip init function before calling this 
one and ignored in the handle_thermal_trip() function


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog