[PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: stacktrace: Skip frame pointer boundary check for call_with_stack()

From: Li Huafei
Date: Wed Jul 27 2022 - 00:03:13 EST


When using the frame pointer unwinder, it was found that the stack trace
output of stack_trace_save() is incomplete if the stack contains
call_with_stack():

[0x7f00002c] dump_stack_task+0x2c/0x90 [hrtimer]
[0x7f0000a0] hrtimer_hander+0x10/0x18 [hrtimer]
[0x801a67f0] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b0/0x3b4
[0x801a7350] hrtimer_run_queues+0xc4/0xd8
[0x801a597c] update_process_times+0x3c/0x88
[0x801b5a98] tick_periodic+0x50/0xd8
[0x801b5bf4] tick_handle_periodic+0x24/0x84
[0x8010ffc4] twd_handler+0x38/0x48
[0x8017d220] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa8/0x244
[0x80176e9c] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c
[0x8052e3a8] gic_handle_irq+0x7c/0x90
[0x808ab15c] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x60/0x80
[0x8051191c] call_with_stack+0x1c/0x20

For the frame pointer unwinder, unwind_frame() checks stackframe::fp by
stackframe::sp. Since call_with_stack() switches the SP from one stack
to another, stackframe::fp and stackframe: :sp will point to different
stacks, so we can no longer check stackframe::fp by stackframe::sp. Skip
checking stackframe::fp at this point to avoid this problem.

Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Linus Waleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S | 2 ++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index d0fa2037460a..af87040b0353 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>

+#include "reboot.h"
+
#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
/*
* Unwind the current stack frame and store the new register values in the
@@ -39,29 +41,53 @@
* Note that with framepointer enabled, even the leaf functions have the same
* prologue and epilogue, therefore we can ignore the LR value in this case.
*/
-int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
+
+extern unsigned long call_with_stack_end;
+
+static int frame_pointer_check(struct stackframe *frame)
{
unsigned long high, low;
unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+ unsigned long pc = frame->pc;
+
+ /*
+ * call_with_stack() is the only place we allow SP to jump from one
+ * stack to another, with FP and SP pointing to different stacks,
+ * skipping the FP boundary check at this point.
+ */
+ if (pc >= (unsigned long)&call_with_stack &&
+ pc < (unsigned long)&call_with_stack_end)
+ return 0;

/* only go to a higher address on the stack */
low = frame->sp;
high = ALIGN(low, THREAD_SIZE);

-#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
if (fp < low + 4 || fp > high - 4)
return -EINVAL;
-
- frame->sp = frame->fp;
- frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
- frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
#else
- /* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
return -EINVAL;
+#endif
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
+{
+ unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
+
+ if (frame_pointer_check(frame))
+ return -EINVAL;

/* restore the registers from the stack frame */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+ frame->sp = frame->fp;
+ frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+ frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
+#else
frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 12));
frame->sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 8));
frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 4));
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S b/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
index 0a268a6c513c..5030d4e8d126 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.S
@@ -46,4 +46,6 @@ UNWIND( .setfp fpreg, sp )
pop {fpreg, pc}
UNWIND( .fnend )
#endif
+ .globl call_with_stack_end
+call_with_stack_end:
ENDPROC(call_with_stack)
--
2.17.1