Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: regulator: Document the PM6125 SPMI PMIC
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed Jul 27 2022 - 04:35:04 EST
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 10:49, Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/26/22 23:36, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 21:11, Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add support for pm6125 compatible string and add relevant supplies in QCom SPMI
> >> regulator documentation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The order of sign-offs seems incorrect. The sender's signature should
> > be the last one.
>
> Sure, will do!
>
> >> ---
> >> .../regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml
> >> index 8b7c4af4b551..d8f18b441484 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml
> >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
> >> properties:
> >> compatible:
> >> enum:
> >> + - qcom,pm6125-regulators
> >> - qcom,pm660-regulators
> >> - qcom,pm660l-regulators
> >> - qcom,pm8004-regulators
> >> @@ -106,6 +107,24 @@ required:
> >> - compatible
> >>
> >> allOf:
> >> + - if:
> >> + properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + contains:
> >> + enum:
> >> + - qcom,pm6125-regulators
> >> + then:
> >> + properties:
> >> + vdd_l1_l7_l17_l18-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l2_l3_l4-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l5_l15_l19_l20_l21_l22-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l6_l8-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l9_l11-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l10_l13_l14-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l12_l16-supply: true
> >> + vdd_l23_l24-supply: true
> >> + patternProperties:
> >> + "^vdd_s[1-8]-supply$": true
> >
> > Add an empty line please.
>
> All other if-then blocks don't have newlines, shall I add one between each as
> well?
Yes, please, in a separate commit.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry