Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf mutex: Wrapped usage of pthread_mutex_t

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Jul 27 2022 - 15:35:54 EST

Next message: Jane Chu: "Re: [PATCH v4] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware"
Previous message: Jack Rosenthal: "Re: [PATCH] firmware: google: Implement vboot workbuf in sysfs"
In reply to: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] perf mutex and cond: Updated every occurrence of pthread_mutex and pthread_cond"
Next in thread: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf mutex: Wrapped usage of pthread_mutex_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Em Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 04:49:51PM +0530, gpavithrasha@xxxxxxxxx escreveu:
> From: pavithra <gpavithrasha@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Added a new header file mutex.h that wraps the
> usage of pthread_mutex_t and updated lock in dso.h.

Hi,

You should create a first patch with just the new mutex.c and
mutex.h files, then you go on to change the users of
pthread_mutex_lock/unlock to the wrappers.

Also please add the license on the first line of the new
mutex.[ch] files, see Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.

tldr; probably what you want is to have this single line in
those the two new files (mutex.[ch]):

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

> Signed-off-by: pavithra <gpavithrasha@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/dso.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> tools/perf/util/dso.h | 3 ++-
> tools/perf/util/mutex.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/mutex.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 4 ++--
> 6 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/mutex.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
> index 8dcfca1a882f..559c20d94c36 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ perf-y += time-utils.o
> perf-y += expr-bison.o
> perf-y += branch.o
> perf-y += mem2node.o
> +perf-y += mutex.o
>
> perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf-loader.o
> perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf_map.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
> index e11ddf86f2b3..605c31585d48 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ void dso__set_module_info(struct dso *dso, struct kmod_path *m,
> */
> static LIST_HEAD(dso__data_open);
> static long dso__data_open_cnt;
> -static pthread_mutex_t dso__data_open_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> +static struct mutex dso__data_open_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;

Please find in include/linux/mutex.h the replacement for
PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER, since we're trying to mimic the kernel mutex
api.

>
> static void dso__list_add(struct dso *dso)
> {
> @@ -633,9 +633,9 @@ static void check_data_close(void)
> */
> void dso__data_close(struct dso *dso)
> {
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> close_dso(dso);
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> }
>
> static void try_to_open_dso(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine)
> @@ -684,20 +684,19 @@ int dso__data_get_fd(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine)
> if (dso->data.status == DSO_DATA_STATUS_ERROR)
> return -1;
>
> - if (pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock) < 0)
> - return -1;
> + mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
>
> try_to_open_dso(dso, machine);
>
> if (dso->data.fd < 0)
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
>
> return dso->data.fd;
> }
>
> void dso__data_put_fd(struct dso *dso __maybe_unused)
> {
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> }
>
> bool dso__data_status_seen(struct dso *dso, enum dso_data_status_seen by)
> @@ -756,7 +755,7 @@ dso_cache__free(struct dso *dso)
> struct rb_root *root = &dso->data.cache;
> struct rb_node *next = rb_first(root);
>
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
> while (next) {
> struct dso_cache *cache;
>
> @@ -765,7 +764,7 @@ dso_cache__free(struct dso *dso)
> rb_erase(&cache->rb_node, root);
> free(cache);
> }
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> }
>
> static struct dso_cache *dso_cache__find(struct dso *dso, u64 offset)
> @@ -802,7 +801,7 @@ dso_cache__insert(struct dso *dso, struct dso_cache *new)
> struct dso_cache *cache;
> u64 offset = new->offset;
>
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
> while (*p != NULL) {
> u64 end;
>
> @@ -823,7 +822,7 @@ dso_cache__insert(struct dso *dso, struct dso_cache *new)
>
> cache = NULL;
> out:
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> return cache;
> }
>
> @@ -843,7 +842,7 @@ static ssize_t file_read(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
> {
> ssize_t ret;
>
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
>
> /*
> * dso->data.fd might be closed if other thread opened another
> @@ -859,7 +858,7 @@ static ssize_t file_read(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
>
> ret = pread(dso->data.fd, data, DSO__DATA_CACHE_SIZE, offset);
> out:
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -953,7 +952,7 @@ static int file_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine)
> struct stat st;
> char sbuf[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
>
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso__data_open_lock);
>
> /*
> * dso->data.fd might be closed if other thread opened another
> @@ -977,7 +976,7 @@ static int file_size(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine)
> dso->data.file_size = st.st_size;
>
> out:
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso__data_open_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1192,7 +1191,7 @@ struct dso *dso__new(const char *name)
> dso->root = NULL;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dso->node);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dso->data.open_entry);
> - pthread_mutex_init(&dso->lock, NULL);
> + mutex_init(&dso->lock);
> refcount_set(&dso->refcnt, 1);
> }
>
> @@ -1226,7 +1225,7 @@ void dso__delete(struct dso *dso)
> dso__free_a2l(dso);
> zfree(&dso->symsrc_filename);
> nsinfo__zput(dso->nsinfo);
> - pthread_mutex_destroy(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_destroy(&dso->lock);
> free(dso);
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.h b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> index e4dddb76770d..e08b2ab48314 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include "build-id.h"
> +#include "mutex.h"
>
> struct machine;
> struct map;
> @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ struct dso_cache {
> struct auxtrace_cache;
>
> struct dso {
> - pthread_mutex_t lock;
> + struct mutex lock;

There was a previous alignment of the member names, when you see
something like this in code you're changing, please keep the style.

> struct list_head node;
> struct rb_node rb_node; /* rbtree node sorted by long name */
> struct rb_root *root; /* root of rbtree that rb_node is in */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mutex.c b/tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b7264a1438c4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +#include <mutex.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +
> +//to avoid the warning : implicit declaration of BUG_ON,
> +//we add the following 2 headers.
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +
> +void mutex_init(struct mutex *mtx)
> +{
> +pthread_mutexattr_t lock_attr;
> +pthread_mutexattr_init(&lock_attr);
> +pthread_mutexattr_settype(&lock_attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK);
> +BUG_ON(pthread_mutex_init(&mtx->lock, &lock_attr));
> +//on success, returns 0.
> +pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&lock_attr);
> +}
> +
> +void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *mtx)
> +{
> +BUG_ON(pthread_mutex_destroy(&mtx->lock)); //on success, returns 0.
> +}
> +
> +void mutex_lock(struct mutex *mtx)
> +{
> +BUG_ON(pthread_mutex_lock(&mtx->lock) != 0);
> +}
> +
> +void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *mtx)
> +{
> +BUG_ON(pthread_mutex_unlock(&mtx->lock) != 0);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mutex.h b/tools/perf/util/mutex.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ab2ebb98b24a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mutex.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +#ifndef __PERF_MUTEX_H
> +#define _PERF_MUTEX_H
> +
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +
> +struct mutex {
> +pthread_mutex_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +void mutex_lock(struct mutex *mtx);
> +void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *mtx);
> +void mutex_init(struct mutex *mtx);
> +void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *mtx);
> +
> +#endif /* _PERF_MUTEX_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index a8f80e427674..342be12cfa1e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> @@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ int dso__load(struct dso *dso, struct map *map)
> }
>
> nsinfo__mountns_enter(dso->nsinfo, &nsc);
> - pthread_mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_lock(&dso->lock);
>
> /* check again under the dso->lock */
> if (dso__loaded(dso)) {
> @@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ int dso__load(struct dso *dso, struct map *map)
> ret = 0;
> out:
> dso__set_loaded(dso);
> - pthread_mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&dso->lock);
> nsinfo__mountns_exit(&nsc);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

--

- Arnaldo

Next message: Jane Chu: "Re: [PATCH v4] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware"
Previous message: Jack Rosenthal: "Re: [PATCH] firmware: google: Implement vboot workbuf in sysfs"
In reply to: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] perf mutex and cond: Updated every occurrence of pthread_mutex and pthread_cond"
Next in thread: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf mutex: Wrapped usage of pthread_mutex_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]