Re: [PATCH] i2c: Use u8 type in i2c transfer calls

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 4:30 PM Jason Gerecke <killertofu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:01 PM Jason Gerecke <killertofu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:21 PM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Writing a patch to fix the new warnings generated by my I2C patch is
> > simple enough, but I'd like some help coordinating getting both
> > patches landed. Should I wait for the I2C patch to land in "for-next"
> > before sending the IIO fix, or would it be preferred to send the IIO
> > fix right now so that both patches can be reviewed simultaneously?
>
> It's been pretty quiet, so asking again for any thoughts on how to
> best address this tangle...

The rule of thumb is not to introduce an additional warning or compile error.
I haven't looked deeply into this case, but it smells to me as if you need a new
version of your initial patch that includes a fix to IIO.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko