On 7/22/22 13:24, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Hi Tudor,
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 7:49 PM Sudip Mukherjee
<sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:02 PM <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/12/22 19:38, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
[You don't often get email from sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Some flash chips which does not have a SFDP table can support Quad
Input Page Program. Enable it in hwcaps if defined.
<snip>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
index 58fbedc94080f..dde636bdb1a7c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ struct spi_nor_fixups {
* SPI_NOR_OCTAL_READ: flash supports Octal Read.
* SPI_NOR_OCTAL_DTR_READ: flash supports octal DTR Read.
* SPI_NOR_OCTAL_DTR_PP: flash supports Octal DTR Page Program.
+ * SPI_NOR_QUAD_PP: flash supports Quad Input Page Program.
You don't need this flag if your flash supports the 4-byte Address
Instruction Table. Does you flash support it? Can you dump all the
SFDP tables, please?
Not sure what the correct way to dump sfdp is. I did this from sysfs.
I tried decoding this SFDP table and I think the parameters table says
it has "3-Byte only addressing".
So, I guess that means it does not support 4-byte Address Instruction
Table. And the datasheet
says it supports "Quad Input Page Program (3-byte Address)".
My existing patchset works for Quad Input Page Program, and I can send
a v2 with the previous
patch and this merged together (as you suggested) or I can try
enabling sfdp for this chip and then use
You should definitely enable SFDP and get rid of the NO_SFDP_FLAGS flags,
regardless of the 1-1-4 PP outcome.
a fixup_flags to enable "Quad Input Page Program" which I think will
be more complicated.
Which one will you suggest?
First I'd like to understand what "much better performance" means. Would
you run some speed tests please? mtd-utils should have a speedtest, otherwise
you can use the in kernel mtd_speedtest module. Page programs are slow anyway,
using 4 lines may not make any difference. But let's see.
About your question, it depends on how common is 1-1-4 pp. If it's common and
desirable we can introduce a flash info flag.