Re: [PATCH 0/9] Samsung Trinity NPU device driver

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Fri Jul 29 2022 - 13:51:05 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[jolsa-perf:bpf/tracing_multi_4 13/35] arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1642:57: warning: 'struct bpf_tramp_link' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration"
Previous message: Daniel Glöckner: "Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: fpga: add binding doc for ecp5-spi fpga mgr"
In reply to: Oded Gabbay: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] Samsung Trinity NPU device driver"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] Samsung Trinity NPU device driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> This driver clearly does not fall into those categories. As long as there
> is no subsystem for NPUs, the only sensible options are drivers/gpu
> and drivers/misc/.

Well, we can create drivers/npu. I'm sure these will get more
widespread.

And GPU people really should be cc-ed.

Best regards,
Pavel

--

Next message: kernel test robot: "[jolsa-perf:bpf/tracing_multi_4 13/35] arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1642:57: warning: 'struct bpf_tramp_link' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration"
Previous message: Daniel Glöckner: "Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: fpga: add binding doc for ecp5-spi fpga mgr"
In reply to: Oded Gabbay: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] Samsung Trinity NPU device driver"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] Samsung Trinity NPU device driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]