Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/msm: Remove unnecessary pm_runtime_get/put
From: Rob Clark
Date: Sun Jul 31 2022 - 11:55:22 EST
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 2:41 AM Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We already enable gpu power from msm_gpu_submit(), so avoid a duplicate
> pm_runtime_get/put from msm_job_run().
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> index 56eecb4..cad4c35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ static struct dma_fence *msm_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *job)
> msm_gem_unlock(obj);
> }
>
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> -
This is removing a _get_sync() and simply relying on a _get() (async)
in msm_gpu_submit().. that seems pretty likely to go badly? I think
it should probably replace the _get() in msm_gpu_submit() with
_get_sync() (but also since this is changing position of
resume/suspend vs active_lock, please make sure you test with lockdep
enabled)
BR,
-R
> /* TODO move submit path over to using a per-ring lock.. */
> mutex_lock(&gpu->lock);
>
> @@ -38,8 +36,6 @@ static struct dma_fence *msm_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *job)
>
> mutex_unlock(&gpu->lock);
>
> - pm_runtime_put(&gpu->pdev->dev);
> -
> return dma_fence_get(submit->hw_fence);
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>