Re: [PATCH 2/4] thermal/of: Return -ENODEV instead of -EINVAL if registration fails

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Mon Aug 08 2022 - 17:33:26 EST


On 8/8/22 13:31, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 08/08/2022 20:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 8/8/22 11:09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The previous version of the OF code was returning -ENODEV if no
thermal zones description was found or if the lookup of the sensor in
the thermal zones was not found.

The backend drivers are expecting this return value as an information
about skipping the sensor initialization and considered as normal.

Fix the return value by replacing -EINVAL by -ENODEV

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
index 368eb58e97cf..4210c18ef7b2 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static struct device_node *of_thermal_zone_find(struct device_node *sensor, int
      np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
      if (!np) {
          pr_err("Unable to find thermal zones description\n");

I really don't like that error message: People will see it (and complain)
whenever a sensor registers and there is no thermal zone, even though that
is perfectly normal (see description above).


I agree, I'll change the message to:

    pr_info("No thermal zones description\n");

sounds good ?


I think it should be silent or at best pr_debug.

Guenter

-        return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+        return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
      }
      /*
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static struct device_node *of_thermal_zone_find(struct device_node *sensor, int
              }
          }
      }
-    tz = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+    tz = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
  out:
      of_node_put(np);
      return tz;