Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In preparation for the addition of bpf_getxattr kfunc.

Given this is taken out of context and the series is not about bpf_getxattr,
this patch should have a better commit description.

> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please also append your SoB then [0].

  [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1

> ---
>   kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index d3e4c86b8fcd..67dfc728fbf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -7244,6 +7244,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
>   	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
>   		return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_STRUCT_OPS;
>   	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> +	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
>   		return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_TRACING;
>   	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL:
>   		return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_SYSCALL;