Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test
From: Maíra Canal
Date: Tue Aug 09 2022 - 18:26:31 EST
On 8/9/22 15:08, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> cpu_possible_mask is not necessarily completely filled. That means
> running a check on cpumask_full() doesn't make sense, so drop the test.
>
> Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644
> --- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
> +++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all;
> static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
> {
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));