Re: [PATCH v9 03/13] block: allow blk-zoned devices to have non-power-of-2 zone size

From: Damien Le Moal
Date: Wed Aug 10 2022 - 13:03:27 EST


On 2022/08/03 2:47, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> Checking if a given sector is aligned to a zone is a common
> operation that is performed for zoned devices. Add
> bdev_is_zone_start helper to check for this instead of opencoding it
> everywhere.
>
> Convert the calculations on zone size to be generic instead of relying on
> power-of-2(po2) based arithmetic in the block layer using the helpers
> wherever possible.
>
> The only hot path affected by this change for zoned devices with po2
> zone size is in blk_check_zone_append() but bdev_is_zone_start() helper is
> used to optimize the calculation for po2 zone sizes.
>
> Finally, allow zoned devices with non po2 zone sizes provided that their
> zone capacity and zone size are equal. The main motivation to allow zoned
> devices with non po2 zone size is to remove the unmapped LBA between
> zone capcity and zone size for devices that cannot have a po2 zone
> capacity.
>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-zoned.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index a0d1104c5590..1cb519220ffb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static inline blk_status_t blk_check_zone_append(struct request_queue *q,
> return BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
>
> /* The bio sector must point to the start of a sequential zone */
> - if (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bio->bi_bdev) - 1) ||
> + if (!bdev_is_zone_start(bio->bi_bdev, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) ||
> !bio_zone_is_seq(bio))
> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-zoned.c b/block/blk-zoned.c
> index dce9c95b4bcd..665b822d13f9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-zoned.c
> +++ b/block/blk-zoned.c
> @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ int blkdev_zone_mgmt(struct block_device *bdev, enum req_op op,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Check alignment (handle eventual smaller last zone) */
> - if (sector & (zone_sectors - 1))
> + if (!bdev_is_zone_start(bdev, sector))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if ((nr_sectors & (zone_sectors - 1)) && end_sector != capacity)
> + if (!bdev_is_zone_start(bdev, nr_sectors) && end_sector != capacity)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> @@ -486,14 +486,26 @@ static int blk_revalidate_zone_cb(struct blk_zone *zone, unsigned int idx,
> * smaller last zone.
> */
> if (zone->start == 0) {
> - if (zone->len == 0 || !is_power_of_2(zone->len)) {
> - pr_warn("%s: Invalid zoned device with non power of two zone size (%llu)\n",
> - disk->disk_name, zone->len);
> + if (zone->len == 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: Invalid zero zone size", disk->disk_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Non power-of-2 zone size support was added to remove the
> + * gap between zone capacity and zone size. Though it is technically
> + * possible to have gaps in a non power-of-2 device, Linux requires
> + * the zone size to be equal to zone capacity for non power-of-2
> + * zoned devices.
> + */
> + if (!is_power_of_2(zone->len) && zone->capacity < zone->len) {
> + pr_err("%s: Invalid zone capacity: %lld with non power-of-2 zone size: %lld",
> + disk->disk_name, zone->capacity, zone->len);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> args->zone_sectors = zone->len;
> - args->nr_zones = (capacity + zone->len - 1) >> ilog2(zone->len);
> + args->nr_zones = div64_u64(capacity + zone->len - 1, zone->len);
> } else if (zone->start + args->zone_sectors < capacity) {
> if (zone->len != args->zone_sectors) {
> pr_warn("%s: Invalid zoned device with non constant zone size\n",
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 22f97427b60b..5aa15172299d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -709,6 +709,30 @@ static inline unsigned int disk_zone_no(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
> return div64_u64(sector, zone_sectors);
> }
>
> +static inline sector_t bdev_offset_from_zone_start(struct block_device *bdev,
> + sector_t sec)
> +{
> + sector_t zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
> + u64 remainder = 0;
> +
> + if (!bdev_is_zoned(bdev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (is_power_of_2(zone_sectors))
> + return sec & (zone_sectors - 1);
> +
> + div64_u64_rem(sec, zone_sectors, &remainder);
> + return remainder;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool bdev_is_zone_start(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sec)
> +{
> + if (!bdev_is_zoned(bdev))
> + return false;
> +
> + return bdev_offset_from_zone_start(bdev, sec) == 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool disk_zone_is_seq(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
> {
> if (!blk_queue_is_zoned(disk->queue))
> @@ -753,6 +777,12 @@ static inline unsigned int disk_zone_no(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool bdev_is_zone_start(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sec)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}

Is this one really necessary ? Any caller of this would also depend on
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED and not compiled if not enabled. So there should be no
callers of this for the !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED case.

> +
> static inline unsigned int bdev_max_open_zones(struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> return 0;


--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research