Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: input: ariel-pwrbutton: use spi-peripheral-props.yaml

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 09:21:35AM +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2022 01:57, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:19:42AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:42:30 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Instead of listing directly properties typical for SPI peripherals,
> >>> reference the spi-peripheral-props.yaml schema.  This allows using all
> >>> properties typical for SPI-connected devices, even these which device
> >>> bindings author did not tried yet.
> >>>
> >>> Remove the spi-* properties which now come via spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> >>> schema, except for the cases when device schema adds some constraints
> >>> like maximum frequency.
> >>>
> >>> While changing additionalProperties->unevaluatedProperties, put it in
> >>> typical place, just before example DTS.a
> >>>
> >>> The binding references also input.yaml and lists explicitly allowed
> >>> properties, thus here reference only spi-peripheral-props.yaml for
> >>> purpose of documenting the SPI slave device and bringing
> >>> spi-max-frequency type validation.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Technically, this depends on [1] merged to SPI tree, if we want to
> >>> preserve existing behavior of not allowing SPI CPHA and CPOL in each of
> >>> schemas in this patch.
> > 
> > Could we merge this through SPI tree as well?
> > 
> >>>
> >>> If this patch comes independently via different tree, the SPI CPHA and
> >>> CPOL will be allowed for brief period of time, before [1] is merged.
> >>> This will not have negative impact, just DT schema checks will be
> >>> loosened for that period.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220722191539.90641-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/ariel-pwrbutton.yaml | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> 
> There is no dependency anymore (and actually that time it was not really
> dependency), so you can take it freely for next cycle.

Hm, it turns out I already applied it and even included in pull request
for Linus. But for some reason my "applied" email was not bcc-ed to me
and so I got terribly confused.

-- 
Dmitry