On 12/08/2022 15:13, Jessica Clarke wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
On 12 Aug 2022, at 14:51, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Building riscv/for-next produces following error:
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:44:7: error: redefinition of 'sbi_pmu_ctr_info'
union sbi_pmu_ctr_info {
^
arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h:125:7: note: previous definition is here
union sbi_pmu_ctr_info {
This appears to have been caused by a merge conflict resolution between
riscv/for-next & riscv/fixes, causing the struct define not being
union, not struct
autopilot, thanks :)
Jess
properly moved to its header.
Fixes: 9a7ccac63f9c ("perf: riscv_pmu{,_sbi}: Miscallenous improvement & fixes")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 14 --------------
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
index e7c6fecbf061..6f6681bbfd36 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
@@ -41,20 +41,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group *riscv_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
NULL,
};
-union sbi_pmu_ctr_info {
- unsigned long value;
- struct {
- unsigned long csr:12;
- unsigned long width:6;
-#if __riscv_xlen == 32
- unsigned long reserved:13;
-#else
- unsigned long reserved:45;
-#endif
- unsigned long type:1;
- };
-};
-
/*
* RISC-V doesn't have hetergenous harts yet. This need to be part of
* per_cpu in case of harts with different pmu counters