Re: [PATCH 4/8] memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc

From: Huang, Shaoqin
Date: Mon Aug 15 2022 - 06:20:51 EST

Next message: tip-bot2 for Jan Beulich: "[tip: x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Have pat_enabled() properly reflect state when running on Xen"
Previous message: Dmitry Osipenko: "Re: [PATCH v1] drm/ttm: Refcount allocated tail pages"
In reply to: Rebecca Mckeever: "[PATCH 4/8] memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc"
Next in thread: Rebecca Mckeever: "[PATCH 5/8] memblock tests: update alloc_api to test memblock_alloc_raw"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi, Rebecca.

On 8/14/2022 1:53 PM, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:

Add tests for memblock_add(), memblock_reserve(), memblock_remove(),
memblock_free(), and memblock_alloc() for the following test scenarios.

memblock_add() and memblock_reserve():
- add/reserve a memory block in the gap between two existing memory
blocks, and check that the blocks are merged into one region
- try to add/reserve memblock regions that extend past PHYS_ADDR_MAX

memblock_remove() and memblock_free():
- remove/free a region when it is the only available region
+ These tests ensure that the first region is overwritten with a
"dummy" region when the last remaining region of that type is
removed or freed.
- remove/free() a region that overlaps with two existing regions of the
relevant type
- try to remove/free memblock regions that extend past PHYS_ADDR_MAX

memblock_alloc():
- try to allocate a region that is larger than the total size of available
memory (memblock.memory)

Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c | 44 ++
tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 499 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 543 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
index 73c2c43e702a..fe1ee3b2e851 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
@@ -470,6 +470,40 @@ static int alloc_no_memory_generic_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * A test that tries to allocate a region that is larger than the total size of
+ * available memory (memblock.memory):
+ *
+ * +-----------------------------------+
+ * | new |
+ * +-----------------------------------+
+ * | |
+ * | |
+ * +---------------------------------+
+ *
+ * Expect no allocation to happen.
+ */
+static int alloc_too_large_generic_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+ void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ setup_memblock();
+
+ allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(MEM_SIZE + SZ_2, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(allocated_ptr, NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, 0);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* A simple test that tries to allocate a small memory region.
* Expect to allocate an aligned region at the beginning of the available
@@ -814,6 +848,15 @@ static int alloc_no_memory_check(void)
return 0;
}
+static int alloc_too_large_check(void)
+{
+ test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
+ run_top_down(alloc_too_large_generic_check);
+ run_bottom_up(alloc_too_large_generic_check);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int memblock_alloc_checks(void)
{
const char *func_testing = "memblock_alloc";
@@ -836,6 +879,7 @@ int memblock_alloc_checks(void)
alloc_no_space_check();
alloc_limited_space_check();
alloc_no_memory_check();
+ alloc_too_large_check();
dummy_physical_memory_cleanup();
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
index 66f46f261e66..ef5642d0863b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
@@ -326,6 +326,102 @@ static int memblock_add_twice_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * A test that tries to add two memory blocks that don't overlap with one
+ * another and then add a third memory block in the space between the first two:
+ *
+ * | +--------+--------+--------+ |
+ * | | r1 | r3 | r2 | |
+ * +--------+--------+--------+--------+--+
+ *
+ * Expect to merge the three entries into one region that starts at r1.base
+ * and has size of r1.size + r2.size + r3.size. The region counter and total
+ * size of the available memory are updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_add_between_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G + SZ_16K,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+ struct region r3 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G + SZ_8K,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = r1.size + r2.size + r3.size;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size);
+ memblock_add(r3.base, r3.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries to add a memory block r when r extends past
+ * PHYS_ADDR_MAX:
+ *
+ * +--------+
+ * | r |
+ * +--------+
+ * | +----+
+ * | | rgn|
+ * +----------------------------+----+
+ *
+ * Expect to add a memory block of size PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r.base. Expect the
+ * total size of available memory and the counter to be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_add_near_max_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_1M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r.base;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_add(r.base, r.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int memblock_add_checks(void)
{
prefix_reset();
@@ -339,6 +435,8 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void)
memblock_add_overlap_bottom_check();
memblock_add_within_check();
memblock_add_twice_check();
+ memblock_add_between_check();
+ memblock_add_near_max_check();
prefix_pop();
@@ -604,6 +702,102 @@ static int memblock_reserve_twice_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * A test that tries to mark two memory blocks that don't overlap as reserved
+ * and then reserve a third memory block in the space between the first two:
+ *
+ * | +--------+--------+--------+ |
+ * | | r1 | r3 | r2 | |
+ * +--------+--------+--------+--------+--+
+ *
+ * Expect to merge the three entries into one reserved region that starts at
+ * r1.base and has size of r1.size + r2.size + r3.size. The region counter and
+ * total for memblock.reserved are updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_reserve_between_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G + SZ_16K,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+ struct region r3 = {
+ .base = SZ_1G + SZ_8K,
+ .size = SZ_8K
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = r1.size + r2.size + r3.size;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size);
+ memblock_reserve(r3.base, r3.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries to reserve a memory block r when r extends past
+ * PHYS_ADDR_MAX:
+ *
+ * +--------+
+ * | r |
+ * +--------+
+ * | +----+
+ * | | rgn|
+ * +----------------------------+----+
+ *
+ * Expect to reserve a memory block of size PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r.base. Expect the
+ * total size of reserved memory and the counter to be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_reserve_near_max_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_1M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r.base;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_reserve(r.base, r.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int memblock_reserve_checks(void)
{
prefix_reset();
@@ -616,6 +810,8 @@ static int memblock_reserve_checks(void)
memblock_reserve_overlap_bottom_check();
memblock_reserve_within_check();
memblock_reserve_twice_check();
+ memblock_reserve_between_check();
+ memblock_reserve_near_max_check();
prefix_pop();
@@ -887,6 +1083,155 @@ static int memblock_remove_within_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries to remove a region r1 from the array of
+ * available memory regions when r1 is the only available region.
+ * Expect to add a memory block r1 and then remove r1 so that a dummy
+ * region is added. The region counter stays the same, and the total size
+ * is updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_remove_only_region_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_2K,
+ .size = SZ_4K
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_remove(r1.base, r1.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, 0);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, 0);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries remove a region r2 from the array of available
+ * memory regions when r2 extends past PHYS_ADDR_MAX:
+ *
+ * +--------+
+ * | r2 |
+ * +--------+
+ * | +---+....+
+ * | |rgn| |
+ * +------------------------+---+----+
+ *
+ * Expect that only the portion between PHYS_ADDR_MAX and r2.base is removed.
+ * Expect the total size of available memory to be updated and the counter to
+ * not be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_remove_near_max_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_2M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_1M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = r1.size - (PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r2.base);
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_remove(r2.base, r2.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A test that tries to remove a region r3 that overlaps with two existing
+ * regions r1 and r2:
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | r3 |
+ * +----------------+
+ * | +----+..... ........+--------+
+ * | | |r1 : : |r2 | |
+ * +----+----+----+---+-------+--------+-----+
+ *
+ * Expect that only the intersections of r1 with r3 and r2 with r3 are removed
+ * from the available memory pool. Expect the total size of available memory to
+ * be updated and the counter to not be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_remove_overlap_two_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2;
+ phys_addr_t r1_size, r2_size, r2_end, r3_end, total_size;
+
+ rgn1 = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
+ rgn2 = &memblock.memory.regions[1];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_16M,
+ .size = SZ_32M
+ };
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = SZ_64M,
+ .size = SZ_64M
+ };
+ struct region r3 = {
+ .base = SZ_32M,
+ .size = SZ_64M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ r2_end = r2.base + r2.size;
+ r3_end = r3.base + r3.size;
+ r1_size = r3.base - r1.base;
+ r2_size = r2_end - r3_end;
+ total_size = r1_size + r2_size;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size);
+ memblock_remove(r3.base, r3.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r3_end);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size);

I think these variable like r1.size and r1_size is a little confused, at least the readability is not very clear.

Maybe modify the r1_size to new_r1_size is more clear, and all other r*_size and r*_end.

It also can use other names, thus make these variable distingush and more clear.

+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 2);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int memblock_remove_checks(void)
{
prefix_reset();
@@ -898,6 +1243,9 @@ static int memblock_remove_checks(void)
memblock_remove_overlap_top_check();
memblock_remove_overlap_bottom_check();
memblock_remove_within_check();
+ memblock_remove_only_region_check();
+ memblock_remove_near_max_check();
+ memblock_remove_overlap_two_check();
prefix_pop();
@@ -1163,6 +1511,154 @@ static int memblock_free_within_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries to free a memory block r1 that was marked
+ * earlier as reserved when r1 is the only available region.
+ * Expect to reserve a memory block r1 and then free r1 so that r1 is
+ * overwritten with a dummy region. The region counter stays the same,
+ * and the total size is updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_free_only_region_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_2K,
+ .size = SZ_4K
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_free((void *)r1.base, r1.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, 0);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, 0);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A simple test that tries free a region r2 when r2 extends past PHYS_ADDR_MAX:
+ *
+ * +--------+
+ * | r2 |
+ * +--------+
+ * | +---+....+
+ * | |rgn| |
+ * +------------------------+---+----+
+ *
+ * Expect that only the portion between PHYS_ADDR_MAX and r2.base is freed.
+ * Expect the total size of reserved memory to be updated and the counter to
+ * not be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_free_near_max_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn;
+ phys_addr_t total_size;
+
+ rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_2M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - SZ_1M,
+ .size = SZ_2M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ total_size = r1.size - (PHYS_ADDR_MAX - r2.base);
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_free((void *)r2.base, r2.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A test that tries to free a reserved region r3 that overlaps with two
+ * existing reserved regions r1 and r2:
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | r3 |
+ * +----------------+
+ * | +----+..... ........+--------+
+ * | | |r1 : : |r2 | |
+ * +----+----+----+---+-------+--------+-----+
+ *
+ * Expect that only the intersections of r1 with r3 and r2 with r3 are freed
+ * from the collection of reserved memory. Expect the total size of reserved
+ * memory to be updated and the counter to not be updated.
+ */
+static int memblock_free_overlap_two_check(void)
+{
+ struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2;
+ phys_addr_t r1_size, r2_size, r2_end, r3_end, total_size;
+
+ rgn1 = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+ rgn2 = &memblock.reserved.regions[1];
+
+ struct region r1 = {
+ .base = SZ_16M,
+ .size = SZ_32M
+ };
+ struct region r2 = {
+ .base = SZ_64M,
+ .size = SZ_64M
+ };
+ struct region r3 = {
+ .base = SZ_32M,
+ .size = SZ_64M
+ };
+
+ PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+ r2_end = r2.base + r2.size;
+ r3_end = r3.base + r3.size;
+ r1_size = r3.base - r1.base;
+ r2_size = r2_end - r3_end;
+ total_size = r1_size + r2_size;

Same as above.

+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+ memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size);
+ memblock_free((void *)r3.base, r3.size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r3_end);
+ ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 2);
+ ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size);
+
+ test_pass_pop();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int memblock_free_checks(void)
{
prefix_reset();
@@ -1174,6 +1670,9 @@ static int memblock_free_checks(void)
memblock_free_overlap_top_check();
memblock_free_overlap_bottom_check();
memblock_free_within_check();
+ memblock_free_only_region_check();
+ memblock_free_near_max_check();
+ memblock_free_overlap_two_check();

Others looks good to me.

prefix_pop();

Next message: tip-bot2 for Jan Beulich: "[tip: x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Have pat_enabled() properly reflect state when running on Xen"
Previous message: Dmitry Osipenko: "Re: [PATCH v1] drm/ttm: Refcount allocated tail pages"
In reply to: Rebecca Mckeever: "[PATCH 4/8] memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc"
Next in thread: Rebecca Mckeever: "[PATCH 5/8] memblock tests: update alloc_api to test memblock_alloc_raw"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]