On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:25:52PM +0800, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your means is that the problem should be fixed by [1]+[2]'s revert ?
I understood that was already the combination you had tested.
You write in [T] that [1] alone causes (another) deadlock and therefore
the revert of [2] was suggested.
I just tested the case which reverted the [2]. Need I test with [1] and [2]?
It'd be better (unless you haven't already :-), my reasoning is for the
[1]+[2] combo.
Thanks,
Michal
[T] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB8ipk_gCLtvEahsp2DvPJf4NxRsM8WCYmmH=yTd7zQE+81_Yg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/