Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support

[Bart Van Assche]

On 8/15/22 03:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Showing all locks held in the system:
> 1 lock held by rcu_tasks_kthre/10:
>   #0: ffff800009575c38 (rcu_tasks.tasks_gp_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x34/0x4c8
> 4 locks held by kworker/0:10/104:
>   #0: ffff0004c0008738 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6a0
>   #1: ffff80000a90bde0
> ((work_completion)(&ap->scsi_rescan_task)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
> process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6a0
>   #2: ffff0004c2b6bf60 (&ap->scsi_scan_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> ata_scsi_dev_rescan+0x28/0x118
>   #3: ffff0004c2902368 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:
> scsi_rescan_device+0x28/0x78
> 1 lock held by in:imklog/636:
>   #0: ffff0004c5ee86e8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x54/0x68
> 1 lock held by hd/1013:
>   #0: ffff0004c06388b8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){.+.+}-{3:3}, at:
> page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x64/0x1a8

Thank you for having shared this information. I will take a closer look 
and see what I can derive from the above information.

> I've just tried with a USB storage device on the same platform,
> and it can be read fine after s2idle.  So it looks like the issue
> is related to SATA.

Unfortunately the above does not learn us anything new. The code 
modified by commit 88f1669019bd ("scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume 
support") is only called if sdev->manage_start_stop != 1. Only the SATA 
code, the Firewire code and the manage_start_stop sysfs attribute store 
method set that member variable:

$ git grep -nH 'manage_start_stop = '
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c:1083:		sdev->manage_start_stop = 1;
drivers/firewire/sbp2.c:1521:		sdev->manage_start_stop = 1;
drivers/scsi/sd.c:240:	sdp->manage_start_stop = v;

Would it be possible to share the output of the command below? That 
should reveal which ATA driver is active on the test setup.

find /sys -name proc_name | xargs grep -aH .

Thanks,

Bart.