[PATCH 5.19 1112/1157] mm/damon/reclaim: fix potential memory leak in damon_reclaim_init()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 188043c7f4f2bd662f2a55957d684fffa543e600 ]

damon_reclaim_init() allocates a memory chunk for ctx with
damon_new_ctx().  When damon_select_ops() fails, ctx is not released,
which will lead to a memory leak.

We should release the ctx with damon_destroy_ctx() when damon_select_ops()
fails to fix the memory leak.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220714063746.2343549-1-niejianglei2021@xxxxxxx
Fixes: 4d69c3457821 ("mm/damon/reclaim: use damon_select_ops() instead of damon_{v,p}a_set_operations()")
Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/damon/reclaim.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
index 4b07c29effe9..0b3c7396cb90 100644
--- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
+++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
@@ -441,8 +441,10 @@ static int __init damon_reclaim_init(void)
 	if (!ctx)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (damon_select_ops(ctx, DAMON_OPS_PADDR))
+	if (damon_select_ops(ctx, DAMON_OPS_PADDR)) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	ctx->callback.after_wmarks_check = damon_reclaim_after_wmarks_check;
 	ctx->callback.after_aggregation = damon_reclaim_after_aggregation;
-- 
2.35.1