[syzbot] inconsistent lock state in p9_req_put

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Aug 15 2022 - 22:17:50 EST

Next message: Tejun Heo: "Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the cgroup tree"
Previous message: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: f6eb0fed6a39 Merge tag 'timers-urgent-2022-08-13' of git:/..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1184fec3080000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ffbab52ef9fab60
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f20b523930c32c160cc
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+2f20b523930c32c160cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.19.0-syzkaller-14264-gf6eb0fed6a39 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
syz-executor.3/10062 [HC1[1]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes:
ffff88801ceb8c18 (&clnt->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_tag_remove net/9p/client.c:367 [inline]
ffff88801ceb8c18 (&clnt->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:375 [inline]
ffff88801ceb8c18 (&clnt->lock){?.+.}-{2:2}, at: p9_req_put+0xc6/0x250 net/9p/client.c:372
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
p9_fd_request+0x85/0x330 net/9p/trans_fd.c:672
p9_client_rpc+0x2f0/0xce0 net/9p/client.c:660
p9_client_version net/9p/client.c:880 [inline]
p9_client_create+0xaec/0x1070 net/9p/client.c:985
v9fs_session_init+0x1e2/0x1810 fs/9p/v9fs.c:408
v9fs_mount+0xba/0xc90 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126
legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
path_mount+0x1326/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
irq event stamp: 1139
hardirqs last enabled at (1138): [<ffffffff89c00190>] __do_softirq+0x190/0x9c6 kernel/softirq.c:555
hardirqs last disabled at (1139): [<ffffffff897eaf31>] common_interrupt+0x11/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:240
softirqs last enabled at (62): [<ffffffff81483e73>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:445 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (62): [<ffffffff81483e73>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x123/0x180 kernel/softirq.c:650
softirqs last disabled at (1137): [<ffffffff81483e73>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:445 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (1137): [<ffffffff81483e73>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x123/0x180 kernel/softirq.c:650

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&clnt->lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&clnt->lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.3/10062:
#0: ffff888066ee2ab0 (&p->alloc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
#0: ffff888066ee2ab0 (&p->alloc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: task_lock include/linux/sched/task.h:174 [inline]
#0: ffff888066ee2ab0 (&p->alloc_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: exit_fs+0x5a/0x170 fs/fs_struct.c:101
#1: ffff88801b98ca20 (&fs->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
#1: ffff88801b98ca20 (&fs->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: exit_fs+0x62/0x170 fs/fs_struct.c:102
#2: ffff888022720020 (&chan->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: req_done+0xcf/0x2e0 net/9p/trans_virtio.c:139

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 10062 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.19.0-syzkaller-14264-gf6eb0fed6a39 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3961 [inline]
valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3973 [inline]
mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4176 [inline]
mark_lock.part.0.cold+0x18/0xd8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4632
mark_lock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4596 [inline]
mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4524 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x14a2/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5007
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
p9_tag_remove net/9p/client.c:367 [inline]
p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:375 [inline]
p9_req_put+0xc6/0x250 net/9p/client.c:372
req_done+0x1de/0x2e0 net/9p/trans_virtio.c:148
vring_interrupt drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2454 [inline]
vring_interrupt+0x29d/0x3d0 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2429
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x227/0x870 kernel/irq/handle.c:158
handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:193 [inline]
handle_irq_event+0xa7/0x1e0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210
handle_edge_irq+0x25f/0xd00 kernel/irq/chip.c:819
generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:158 [inline]
handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:231 [inline]
__common_interrupt+0x9d/0x210 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:250
common_interrupt+0x4d/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:240
asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:640
RIP: 0010:__do_softirq+0x196/0x9c6 kernel/softirq.c:557
Code: 00 48 01 f0 48 89 44 24 18 48 c7 c7 c0 41 eb 89 e8 5f ff be ff 65 66 c7 05 35 94 43 76 00 00 e8 70 ab c1 f7 fb b8 ff ff ff ff <48> c7 c3 c0 a0 c0 8b 41 0f bc c5 41 89 c7 41 83 c7 01 0f 85 ad 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000007f70 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: ffff888066ee2140 RCX: 1ffffffff211cc2e
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000102 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff8880125241c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffff908d9967
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000080 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:445 [inline]
__irq_exit_rcu+0x123/0x180 kernel/softirq.c:650
irq_exit_rcu+0x5/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:662
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x93/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1106
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:649
RIP: 0010:lock_acquire+0x1ef/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
Code: d2 a3 7e 83 f8 01 0f 85 e8 02 00 00 9c 58 f6 c4 02 0f 85 fb 02 00 00 48 83 7c 24 08 00 74 01 fb 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df <48> 01 c3 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 c7 43 08 00 00 00 00 48 8b 84 24
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000357fa48 EFLAGS: 00000206
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 1ffff920006aff4b RCX: ffffffff815e513e
RDX: 1ffff1100cddc576 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff908d9967
R10: fffffbfff211b32c R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88801b98ca20 R15: 0000000000000000
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
exit_fs+0x62/0x170 fs/fs_struct.c:102
do_exit+0xaa6/0x29b0 kernel/exit.c:791
do_group_exit+0xd2/0x2f0 kernel/exit.c:925
get_signal+0x238c/0x2610 kernel/signal.c:2857
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2300 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:869
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:166 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:201
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:283 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:294
do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f0b07489279
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7f0b0748924f.
RSP: 002b:00007f0b085a3218 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007f0b0759bf88 RCX: 00007f0b07489279
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007f0b0759bf88
RBP: 00007f0b0759bf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f0b0759bf8c
R13: 00007ffdfa1bfd4f R14: 00007f0b085a3300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 00 48 01 add %cl,0x1(%rax)
3: f0 48 89 44 24 18 lock mov %rax,0x18(%rsp)
9: 48 c7 c7 c0 41 eb 89 mov $0xffffffff89eb41c0,%rdi
10: e8 5f ff be ff callq 0xffbeff74
15: 65 66 c7 05 35 94 43 movw $0x0,%gs:0x76439435(%rip) # 0x76439454
1c: 76 00 00
1f: e8 70 ab c1 f7 callq 0xf7c1ab94
24: fb sti
25: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
* 2a: 48 c7 c3 c0 a0 c0 8b mov $0xffffffff8bc0a0c0,%rbx <-- trapping instruction
31: 41 0f bc c5 bsf %r13d,%eax
35: 41 89 c7 mov %eax,%r15d
38: 41 83 c7 01 add $0x1,%r15d
3c: 0f .byte 0xf
3d: 85 .byte 0x85
3e: ad lods %ds:(%rsi),%eax

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Next message: Tejun Heo: "Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the cgroup tree"
Previous message: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Add support for writing to nf_conn:mark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]