Re: [PATCH 1/8] memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory

From: Rebecca Mckeever
Date: Tue Aug 16 2022 - 02:56:06 EST

Next message: Bagas Sanjaya: "Re: [PATCH] docs: admin-guide/mm:"
Previous message: Xu Yilun: "Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] fpga: ecp5-spi: add Lattice ECP5 FPGA manager"
Next in thread: Huang, Shaoqin: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 04:50:51PM +0800, Huang, Shaoqin wrote:
> Hi, Rebecca.
>
> On 8/14/2022 1:53 PM, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > Add an assert in memblock_alloc() tests where allocation is expected to
> > occur. The assert checks whether the entire chunk of allocated memory is
> > cleared.
> >
> > The current memblock_alloc() tests do not check whether the allocated
> > memory was zeroed. memblock_alloc() should zero the allocated memory since
> > it is a wrapper for memblock_alloc_try_nid().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 7 +++++++
> > tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
> > index a14f38eb8a89..71c89cb9b2a8 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_api.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ static int alloc_top_down_simple_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, expected_start);
> > @@ -80,6 +82,8 @@ static int alloc_top_down_disjoint_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r2_size, alignment);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r2_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
> > @@ -125,6 +129,8 @@ static int alloc_top_down_before_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r2_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r2_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, memblock_end_of_DRAM() - total_size);
> > @@ -173,6 +179,8 @@ static int alloc_top_down_after_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r2_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r2_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base - r2_size);
> > @@ -223,6 +231,8 @@ static int alloc_top_down_second_fit_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r3_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r3_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r2.size + r3_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r2.base - r3_size);
> > @@ -277,6 +287,8 @@ static int alloc_in_between_generic_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r3_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r3_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base - r2.size - r3_size);
> > @@ -418,6 +430,8 @@ static int alloc_limited_space_generic_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(available_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, available_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, MEM_SIZE);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, memblock_start_of_DRAM());
> > @@ -442,6 +456,7 @@ static int alloc_no_memory_generic_check(void)
> > PREFIX_PUSH();
> > reset_memblock_regions();
> > + fill_memblock();
>
> Maybe we don't need this line, it has no effect at here. Anyway, Others
> Looks Good to me.
>
Do you mean that it's not necessary since the test doesn't run
verify_mem_content()?

> Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(SZ_1K, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > @@ -472,6 +487,8 @@ static int alloc_bottom_up_simple_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(SZ_2, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, SZ_2);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, SZ_2);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, memblock_start_of_DRAM());
> > @@ -528,6 +545,7 @@ static int alloc_bottom_up_disjoint_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r2_size, alignment);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r2_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
> > @@ -571,6 +589,8 @@ static int alloc_bottom_up_before_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r1_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r1_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, memblock_start_of_DRAM());
> > @@ -618,6 +638,8 @@ static int alloc_bottom_up_after_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r2_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r2_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, total_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
> > @@ -669,6 +691,8 @@ static int alloc_bottom_up_second_fit_check(void)
> > allocated_ptr = memblock_alloc(r3_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> > ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > + ASSERT_MEM_EQ((char *)allocated_ptr, 0, r3_size);
> > +
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r2.size + r3_size);
> > ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r2.base);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
> > index 76a8ad818f3a..0ca26fe12c38 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
> > @@ -60,16 +60,23 @@ void reset_memblock_attributes(void)
> > memblock.current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE;
> > }
> > +void fill_memblock(void)
> > +{
> > + memset(memory_block.base, 1, MEM_SIZE);
> > +}
> > +
> > void setup_memblock(void)
> > {
> > reset_memblock_regions();
> > memblock_add((phys_addr_t)memory_block.base, MEM_SIZE);
> > + fill_memblock();
> > }
> > void dummy_physical_memory_init(void)
> > {
> > memory_block.base = malloc(MEM_SIZE);
> > assert(memory_block.base);
> > + fill_memblock();
> > }
> > void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void)
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
> > index d396e5423a8e..7a16a7dc8f2c 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,18 @@
> > assert((_expected) < (_seen)); \
> > } while (0)
> > +/**
> > + * ASSERT_MEM_EQ():
> > + * Check that the first @_size bytes of @_seen are all equal to @_expected.
> > + * If false, print failed test message (if running with --verbose) and then
> > + * assert.
> > + */
> > +#define ASSERT_MEM_EQ(_seen, _expected, _size) do { \
> > + for (int _i = 0; _i < (_size); _i++) { \
> > + ASSERT_EQ((_seen)[_i], (_expected)); \
> > + } \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > #define PREFIX_PUSH() prefix_push(__func__)
> > /*
> > @@ -70,6 +82,7 @@ struct region {
> > void reset_memblock_regions(void);
> > void reset_memblock_attributes(void);
> > +void fill_memblock(void);
> > void setup_memblock(void);
> > void dummy_physical_memory_init(void);
> > void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void);

Next message: Bagas Sanjaya: "Re: [PATCH] docs: admin-guide/mm:"
Previous message: Xu Yilun: "Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] fpga: ecp5-spi: add Lattice ECP5 FPGA manager"
Next in thread: Huang, Shaoqin: "Re: [PATCH 1/8] memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]