Re: [PATCH] treewide: Complete variable type

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Tue Aug 16 2022 - 04:39:07 EST




Le 15/08/2022 à 21:53, Xin Gao a écrit :
> It is better to use "unsigned int" instead of "unsigned", line 24.

The Subject in wrong: It is not a treewide patch but only a powerpc
patch as far as I understand.

Christophe

>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Gao <gaoxin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/epapr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/epapr.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/epapr.c
> index 7c5b26ade6c4..4133bee28673 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/epapr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/epapr.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ BSS_STACK(4096);
> #define EPAPR_SMAGIC 0x65504150
> #define EPAPR_EMAGIC 0x45504150
>
> -static unsigned epapr_magic;
> +static unsigned int epapr_magic;
> static unsigned long ima_size;
> static unsigned long fdt_addr;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>