Re: [PATCH 06/12] riscv: dts: allwinner: Add the D1 SoC base devicetree

[Conor.Dooley]

On 16/08/2022 12:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 16/08/2022 14:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> I think one reason might be that this is so central to the whole SoC
>>> operation, that it's already referenced multiple times in the base .dtsi.
>>> And having a yet unresolved reference in the .dtsi looks dodgy.
>>>
>>> NVidia seems to omit a base oscillator (maybe it's implicit in their
>>> binding design), Marvell doesn't use a fixed-clock (but still puts their
>>> base clock in armada-37xx.dtsi).
>>>
>>> Exynos and Renesas put a *stub* fixed-clock in the .dtsi, and set the
>>> frequency in the board .dts files. Would this be a compromise?
>>
>> This is exactly what I said before. The clock frequency is a property of
>> the board. Feel free to keep the rest of the clock in the SoC DTSI to
>> reduce duplication, but at minimum the clock should go to the board.
> 
> 
> s/minimum the clock should go to the board/minimum the clock frequency
> should go to the board./

FWIW this is what the PolarFire SoC stuff does (thanks to either
yourself or Geert) & it'd be nice to continue that precedence for
riscv dts going forward. No point IMO in duplicating things done
in the past in arch/arm if that's now considered bad practice.