Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8186: Fix 'reg-names' for pinctrl nodes

[Nícolas F. R. A. Prado]

Hi Allen,

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:26:15PM +0800, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> The mt8186 contains 8 GPIO physical address bases that correspond to
> the 'reg-names' of the pinctrl driver. The 'reg-names' entries in
> bindings are ordered incorrectly, though. The system crashes due of an
> erroneous address when the regulator initializes.
> 
> We fix the 'reg-names' for the pinctrl nodes and the pinctrl-mt8186
> example in bindings.
> 
> Fixes: 338e953f1bd1 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8186: add pinctrl file and binding document")
> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The sender's (your) signed-off-by should come last [1]. Also, what is the
participation of Guodong in this patch? If Guodong helped in writing the patch
there should also be a Co-developed-by tag for Guodong, as shown in [1].

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by

> ---
[..]
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8186.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8186.yaml
[..]
> @@ -232,12 +232,12 @@ examples:
>              <0x10002200 0x0200>,
>              <0x10002400 0x0200>,
>              <0x10002600 0x0200>,
> -            <0x10002A00 0x0200>,
> +            <0x10002a00 0x0200>,

Also, you should avoid making changes that don't have to do with the patch
itself. This patch is about fixing the reg names, so no need to touch the
formatting of addresses. It just adds noise.

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Nícolas