Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add MCQ support

[Bart Van Assche]

On 8/11/22 03:33, Can Guo wrote:
> +static int ufs_qcom_get_outstanding_cqs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> +					unsigned long *ocqs)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

Why does the get_outstanding_cqs vop exist since the only implementation 
of that vop returns EINVAL?

> +static int ufs_qcom_config_mcq_rop(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	struct ufshcd_mcq_rop_info_t *rop;
> +	struct ufshcd_res_info_t *mem_res, *sqdao_res;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mem_res = &hba->res[RES_MEM];
> +	sqdao_res = &hba->res[RES_MCQ_SQD];
> +
> +	if (!mem_res->base || !sqdao_res->base)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ROP_MAX; i++) {
> +		rop = &hba->mcq_rop[i];
> +		rop->offset = sqdao_res->resource->start -
> +			      mem_res->resource->start + 0x40 * i;
> +		rop->stride = 0x100;
> +		rop->base = sqdao_res->base + 0x40 * i;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Is there anything in the above function that is specific to the Qualcomm 
controller? If not, please move the above code into ufshcd.c.

> +static int ufs_qcom_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> +}

Since there is a register in the UFSHCI 4.0 specification from which the 
maximum number of outstanding commands can be retrieved, why does the 
get_hba_mac vop exist?

Thanks,

Bart.