Re: [PATCH v1] regmap: introduce value tracing for regmap bulk operations

[Dmitry Rokosov]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:44:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > I didn't realise that was even a question, but then there seems to be
> > > some discussion I've not seen given the CCing going on.  The biggest
> > > issue is do we even want the overhead but I'll need to find time to look
> > > at this properly.
> 
> > No any additional discussion before. I've added your address to all emails
> > which I sent.
> 
> I assume you copied in Thomas, Rasmus and Marc for some reason?

No reason, sorry for make misunderstanding here.
I have listed other regmap discussions and added them to get more opinions.

> 
> > Why do you think it this patch will bring overhead to regmap? AFAK, when
> > tracepoint is disabled, tracepoint fast assign operation shouldn't be
> > executed. In other words, memcpy will not be applied.
> 
> To repeat I have not yet looked at your patch properly, one concern is
> how we handle the marshalling which regmap does.

Okay, no problem

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry