[PATCH 5.10 266/545] dccp: put dccp_qpolicy_full() and dccp_qpolicy_push() in the same lock
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Aug 19 2022 - 12:20:09 EST
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit a41b17ff9dacd22f5f118ee53d82da0f3e52d5e3 ]
In the case of sk->dccps_qpolicy == DCCPQ_POLICY_PRIO, dccp_qpolicy_full
will drop a skb when qpolicy is full. And the lock in dccp_sendmsg is
released before sock_alloc_send_skb and then relocked after
sock_alloc_send_skb. The following conditions may lead dccp_qpolicy_push
to add skb to an already full sk_write_queue:
thread1--->lock
thread1--->dccp_qpolicy_full: queue is full. drop a skb
thread1--->unlock
thread2--->lock
thread2--->dccp_qpolicy_full: queue is not full. no need to drop.
thread2--->unlock
thread1--->lock
thread1--->dccp_qpolicy_push: add a skb. queue is full.
thread1--->unlock
thread2--->lock
thread2--->dccp_qpolicy_push: add a skb!
thread2--->unlock
Fix this by moving dccp_qpolicy_full.
Fixes: b1308dc015eb ("[DCCP]: Set TX Queue Length Bounds via Sysctl")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220729110027.40569-1-hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/dccp/proto.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dccp/proto.c b/net/dccp/proto.c
index 548cf0135647..65e81e0199b0 100644
--- a/net/dccp/proto.c
+++ b/net/dccp/proto.c
@@ -747,11 +747,6 @@ int dccp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
lock_sock(sk);
- if (dccp_qpolicy_full(sk)) {
- rc = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_release;
- }
-
timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, noblock);
/*
@@ -770,6 +765,11 @@ int dccp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
if (skb == NULL)
goto out_release;
+ if (dccp_qpolicy_full(sk)) {
+ rc = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out_discard;
+ }
+
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_CLOSED) {
rc = -ENOTCONN;
goto out_discard;
--
2.35.1