Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] fanotify: define struct members to hold response decision context

From: Richard Guy Briggs
Date: Fri Aug 19 2022 - 17:45:49 EST

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH v2] asm goto: eradicate CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix i386 frame size warning"
In reply to: Nick Desaulniers: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] fanotify: define struct members to hold response decision context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2022-08-19 10:17, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 9:25 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-08-10 22:28, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> > >
> > > [auto build test WARNING on jack-fs/fsnotify]
> > > [also build test WARNING on pcmoore-audit/next linus/master v5.19 next-20220810]
> > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> > >
> > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Richard-Guy-Briggs/fanotify-Allow-user-space-to-pass-back-additional-audit-info/20220810-012825
> > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git fsnotify
> > > config: i386-randconfig-a013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220810/202208102231.qSUdYAdb-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> > > compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5f1c7e2cc5a3c07cbc2412e851a7283c1841f520)
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/a943676abc023c094f05b45f4d61936c567507a2
> > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Richard-Guy-Briggs/fanotify-Allow-user-space-to-pass-back-additional-audit-info/20220810-012825
> > > git checkout a943676abc023c094f05b45f4d61936c567507a2
> > > # save the config file
> > > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/notify/fanotify/
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > >> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:325:35: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Wformat]
> >
> > Interesting. When I "fix" it, my compiler complains:
> >
> > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:324:11: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 8 has type ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
>
> The correct format specifier for size_t is %zu. This avoids issues
> between ILP32 vs LP64 targets.

Perfect, thanks!

> > > group, fd, response, info_buf, count);
> > > ^~~~~
> > > include/linux/printk.h:594:38: note: expanded from macro 'pr_debug'
> > > no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/linux/printk.h:131:17: note: expanded from macro 'no_printk'
> > > printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > > ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/linux/printk.h:464:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk'
> > > #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/linux/printk.h:436:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap'
> > > _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > > ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > 1 warning generated.
> > >
> > >
> > > vim +325 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> > >
> > > 312
> > > 313 static int process_access_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > > 314 struct fanotify_response *response_struct,
> > > 315 const char __user *buf,
> > > 316 size_t count)
> > > 317 {
> > > 318 struct fanotify_perm_event *event;
> > > 319 int fd = response_struct->fd;
> > > 320 u32 response = response_struct->response;
> > > 321 struct fanotify_response_info_header info_hdr;
> > > 322 char *info_buf = NULL;
> > > 323
> > > 324 pr_debug("%s: group=%p fd=%d response=%u buf=%p size=%lu\n", __func__,
> > > > 325 group, fd, response, info_buf, count);
> > > 326 /*
> > > 327 * make sure the response is valid, if invalid we do nothing and either
> > > 328 * userspace can send a valid response or we will clean it up after the
> > > 329 * timeout
> > > 330 */
> > > 331 if (response & ~FANOTIFY_RESPONSE_VALID_MASK)
> > > 332 return -EINVAL;
> > > 333 switch (response & FANOTIFY_RESPONSE_ACCESS) {
> > > 334 case FAN_ALLOW:
> > > 335 case FAN_DENY:
> > > 336 break;
> > > 337 default:
> > > 338 return -EINVAL;
> > > 339 }
> > > 340 if ((response & FAN_AUDIT) && !FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_ENABLE_AUDIT))
> > > 341 return -EINVAL;
> > > 342 if (fd < 0)
> > > 343 return -EINVAL;
> > > 344 if (response & FAN_INFO) {
> > > 345 size_t c = count;
> > > 346 const char __user *ib = buf;
> > > 347
> > > 348 if (c <= 0)
> > > 349 return -EINVAL;
> > > 350 while (c >= sizeof(info_hdr)) {
> > > 351 if (copy_from_user(&info_hdr, ib, sizeof(info_hdr)))
> > > 352 return -EFAULT;
> > > 353 if (info_hdr.pad != 0)
> > > 354 return -EINVAL;
> > > 355 if (c < info_hdr.len)
> > > 356 return -EINVAL;
> > > 357 switch (info_hdr.type) {
> > > 358 case FAN_RESPONSE_INFO_AUDIT_RULE:
> > > 359 break;
> > > 360 case FAN_RESPONSE_INFO_NONE:
> > > 361 default:
> > > 362 return -EINVAL;
> > > 363 }
> > > 364 c -= info_hdr.len;
> > > 365 ib += info_hdr.len;
> > > 366 }
> > > 367 if (c != 0)
> > > 368 return -EINVAL;
> > > 369 /* Simplistic check for now */
> > > 370 if (count != sizeof(struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule))
> > > 371 return -EINVAL;
> > > 372 info_buf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fanotify_response_info_audit_rule),
> > > 373 GFP_KERNEL);
> > > 374 if (!info_buf)
> > > 375 return -ENOMEM;
> > > 376 if (copy_from_user(info_buf, buf, count))
> > > 377 return -EFAULT;
> > > 378 }
> > > 379 spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
> > > 380 list_for_each_entry(event, &group->fanotify_data.access_list,
> > > 381 fae.fse.list) {
> > > 382 if (event->fd != fd)
> > > 383 continue;
> > > 384
> > > 385 list_del_init(&event->fae.fse.list);
> > > 386 /* finish_permission_event() eats info_buf */
> > > 387 finish_permission_event(group, event, response_struct,
> > > 388 count, info_buf);
> > > 389 wake_up(&group->fanotify_data.access_waitq);
> > > 390 return 0;
> > > 391 }
> > > 392 spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
> > > 393
> > > 394 return -ENOENT;
> > > 395 }
> > > 396
> > >
> > > --
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > > https://01.org/lkp
> > >
> >
> > - RGB
> >
> > --
> > Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
> > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
>

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

Next message: Nathan Chancellor: "Re: [PATCH v2] asm goto: eradicate CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix i386 frame size warning"
In reply to: Nick Desaulniers: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] fanotify: define struct members to hold response decision context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]