Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] watch_queue: Clean up some code

[Siddh Raman Pant]

On Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:40 +0530  Siddh Raman Pant  wrote:
> There is a dangling reference to pipe in a watch_queue after clearing it.
> Thus, NULL that pointer while clearing.
> 
> This change renders wqueue->defunct superfluous, as the latter is only used
> to check if watch_queue is cleared. With this change, the pipe is NULLed
> while clearing, so we can just check if the pipe is NULL.
> 
> Extending comment for watch_queue->pipe in the definition of watch_queue
> made the comment conventionally too long (it was already past 80 chars),
> so I have changed the struct annotations to be kerneldoc-styled, so that
> I can extend the comment mentioning that the pipe is NULL when watch_queue
> is cleared. In the process, I have also hopefully improved documentation
> by documenting things which weren't documented before.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Merged the NULLing and removing defunct patches.
> - Removed READ_ONCE barrier in lock_wqueue().
> - Improved and fixed errors in struct docs.
> - Better commit messages.
> 
> Siddh Raman Pant (2):
>   include/linux/watch_queue: Improve documentation
>   kernel/watch_queue: NULL the dangling *pipe, and use it for clear
>     check
> 
>  include/linux/watch_queue.h | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  kernel/watch_queue.c        |  12 ++---
>  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Hello,

Maybe the above quoted patch was missed due to the
then-ongoing merge window. This can be found on:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1659771577.git.code@xxxxxxxx/

This patch was posted 2 weeks ago, with changes as requested.

With the merge window closed, may I request for another look at
this patch?

Thanks,
Siddh