Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/14] 5.15.62-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 01:57:05PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 21:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.62 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:36:59 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.62-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> Following regression found on s390.
> 
> > Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     kexec_file: drop weak attribute from functions
> 
> The s390 defconfig build failed on stable-rc 5.15 with gcc-11 and clang.
> 
> 
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:336:5: error: redefinition of
> 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe'
> int arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>     ^
> include/linux/kexec.h:190:1: note: previous definition is here
> arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> unsigned long buf_len)
> ^
> 1 error generated.
> 

argh, these kexec patches are such a pain.  I'll go drop them from 5.15
now and push out a -rc2 that hopefully will fix this.

thanks,

greg k-h