Re: [PATCH V2] clk: imx: support protected-clocks

[Peng Fan]

On 8/16/2022 11:02 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:03:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > For the clocks listed in protected-clocks, enable them to avoid
> > Linux disable them. This will benifit root Linux and inmate cell run
> > on top of Jailhouse hypervisor, and benifit the other case(
> > A53 Linux run together with M7 RTOS).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > V2:
> >   Per Sascha, use common protected-clocks property.
>
> See my mail to v1. I did not request that you should use the
> protected-clocks property:
>
> > There were cases when a property first started with a "soc," prefix and
> > later when people realized that it could be useful for other
> > drivers/SoCs as well, the prefix was removed. With that in mind I
> > would expect that a "fsl,protected-clocks" property behaves the same
> > as a "protected-clocks" property without the prefix.
> >
> > If it doesn't please pick a different name. I didn't want to suggest
> > to just drop the "fsl," prefix and to use the generic property name
> > when the properties have a different meaning.

oh, I misunderstood.

Here I just wanna linux prepare enable clks and never off them,
the clks may vary per different usecase.

how about
fsl,init-on-clks=<xx>?
or extend to
fsl,init-on-clks-with-rate=<xx>?

Thanks,
Peng.
> Sascha