From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 7:13 PM
rtaddr_reg = dmar_readq(iommu->reg + DMAR_RTADDR_REG);
- ext = !!(rtaddr_reg & DMA_RTADDR_RTT);
- new_ext = !!ecap_ecs(iommu->ecap);
+ ext = !!(rtaddr_reg & DMA_RTADDR_SMT);
+ new_ext = !!ecap_smts(iommu->ecap);
should be !!sm_supported()
Not really. The IOMMU was setup by the previous kernel. Here we just
check whether the scalable mode was enabled there.
You want to compare whether old kernel and new kernel enable
the same mode. ecap_smts is only about the capability. only
sm_supported() can tell the mode which is actually used by the
new kernel.
/*
* The RTT bit can only be changed when translation is disabled,
@@ -2747,6 +2705,10 @@ static int copy_translation_tables(struct
intel_iommu *iommu)
if (new_ext != ext)
return -EINVAL;
+ iommu->copied_tables = bitmap_zalloc(BIT_ULL(16), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!iommu->copied_tables)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
old_rt_phys = rtaddr_reg & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
if (!old_rt_phys)
return -EINVAL;
Out of curiosity. What is the rationale that we copy root table and
context tables but not pasid tables?
We only copy the context table and reconstruct it when the default
domain is attached. Before that, there's no need to reconstruct the
pasid table, hence it's safe to use the previous pasid tables.
I still didn't get why context table must be reconstructed but not
pasid table...