Re: [PATCH v3] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Send host event for prepare/complete

From: Tim Van Patten
Date: Tue Aug 23 2022 - 13:56:52 EST


On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 8:49 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:21:47AM -0600, Tim Van Patten wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:08 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 11:40:08AM -0600, Tim Van Patten wrote:
> > > > Update cros_ec_lpc_pm_ops to call cros_ec_lpc_prepare() during PM
> > > > .prepare() and cros_ec_lpc_complete() during .complete(). This allows the
> > > > EC to log entry/exit of AP's suspend/resume more accurately.
> > >
> > > As what I commented on [1], the term "host event" in the commit title is
> > > confusing. Also, as this is a cros_ec_lpc specific patch, please change
> > > the prefix.
> >
> > I've updated the prefix to "cros_ec_lpc" and the title/description to
> > indicate that this CL moves when the host event is sent to
> > .prepare()/.complete().
> >
> > > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/chrome-platform/patch/20220706205136.v2.1.Ic7a7c81f880ab31533652e0928aa6e687bb268b5@changeid/#24934911
>
> I'm not sure if any unclear. "host event" is a terminology for CrOS EC.
> The usage here is confusing.

I updated the title/description to "host command".

>
> > >
> > > > -static int cros_ec_lpc_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > +static void cros_ec_lpc_complete(struct device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_resume(ec_dev);
> > > >
> > > > - return cros_ec_resume(ec_dev);
> > > > + dev_info(dev, "EC resume completed: ret = %d\n", ret);
> > >
> > > cros_ec_resume() always returns 0.
> >
> > Yes, it always returns 0 today, but that may not be the case forever.
> > While "ret" is not returned by cros_ec_resume() today, it's possible
> > for it to be non-zero and someone may update cros_ec_resume() to
> > return that status.
>
> Does it really need to print if `ret` is always 0?

Yes, we should always print the return value in case it changes in the future.

--

Tim Van Patten | ChromeOS | timvp@xxxxxxxxxx | (720) 432-0997