On 24/08/2022 07:31, Tong Tiangen wrote:
Hi riscv maintainers, kindly ping...
Thanks,
Tong.
在 2022/8/15 11:20, Tong Tiangen 写道:
It's barely been more than a week, relax :)
checkpatch really does not like one of the macros you added. Please
consider whether this is valid:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#38: FILE: arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-extable.h:61:
+#define _ASM_EXTABLE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO(insn, fixup, err, zero) \
+ __DEFINE_ASM_GPR_NUMS \
+ __ASM_EXTABLE_RAW(#insn, #fixup, \
+ __stringify(EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO), \
+ "(" \
+ EX_DATA_REG(ERR, err) " | " \
+ EX_DATA_REG(ZERO, zero) \
+ ")")
Thanks,
Conor.
This patchset do some refactorings related to riscv's uaccess and extable,
mainly for the usage of __get/put_user_nocheck() which not distinguish user
access and kernel access.
v1 -> v2:
According to Conor's suggestion, split into two logically independent
patches.
Tong Tiangen (2):
riscv: uaccess: rename __get/put_user_nocheck to __get/put_mem_nocheck
riscv: extable: add new extable type EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO support
arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-extable.h | 12 ++
arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 162 +++++++++++++--------------
arch/riscv/mm/extable.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)