Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx334: support lower bandwidth mode

From: Jacopo Mondi
Date: Thu Aug 25 2022 - 07:58:31 EST

Next message: Ido Schimmel: "Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: bcm: Convert drivers to use struct pingroup and PINCTRL_PINGROUP()"
In reply to: Shravan.Chippa: "RE: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx334: support lower bandwidth mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Shravan,

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:09:03AM +0000, Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: 25 August 2022 01:00 PM
> > To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: paul.j.murphy@xxxxxxxxx; daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Conor Dooley - M52691
> > <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Battu Prakash Reddy - I30399
> > <Prakash.Battu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx334: support lower bandwidth mode
> >
> > [You don't often get email from jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is
> > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > Hi Shravan
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:16:22AM +0000, Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: 22 August 2022 09:23 PM
> > > > To: shravan Chippa - I35088 <Shravan.Chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: paul.j.murphy@xxxxxxxxx; daniele.alessandrelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > > mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Conor Dooley - M52691
> > > > <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Battu Prakash Reddy - I30399
> > > > <Prakash.Battu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx334: support lower bandwidth
> > > > mode
> > > >
> > > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > > > know the content is safe
> > > >
> > > > Hello Shravan,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:00:44PM +0530, shravan kumar wrote:
> > > > > From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Some platforms may not be capable of supporting the bandwidth
> > > > > required for 12 bit or 3840x2160 resolutions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add support for dynamically selecting 10 bit and 1920x1080
> > > > > resolutions while leaving the existing configuration as default
> > > > >
> > > > > CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Prakash Battu <Prakash.Battu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c | 306
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > 1 file changed, 279 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c index 062125501788..d1fa4c4d4d9e
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > > > > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ struct imx334_reg_list {
> > > > > * struct imx334_mode - imx334 sensor mode structure
> > > > > * @width: Frame width
> > > > > * @height: Frame height
> > > > > - * @code: Format code
> > > > > * @hblank: Horizontal blanking in lines
> > > > > * @vblank: Vertical blanking in lines
> > > > > * @vblank_min: Minimal vertical blanking in lines @@ -91,7 +90,6
> > > > > @@ struct imx334_reg_list { struct imx334_mode {
> > > > > u32 width;
> > > > > u32 height;
> > > > > - u32 code;
> > > > > u32 hblank;
> > > > > u32 vblank;
> > > > > u32 vblank_min;
> > > > > @@ -119,6 +117,7 @@ struct imx334_mode {
> > > > > * @vblank: Vertical blanking in lines
> > > > > * @cur_mode: Pointer to current selected sensor mode
> > > > > * @mutex: Mutex for serializing sensor controls
> > > > > + * @cur_code: current selected format code
> > > > > * @streaming: Flag indicating streaming state
> > > > > */
> > > > > struct imx334 {
> > > > > @@ -140,6 +139,7 @@ struct imx334 {
> > > > > u32 vblank;
> > > > > const struct imx334_mode *cur_mode;
> > > > > struct mutex mutex;
> > > > > + u32 cur_code;
> > > > > bool streaming;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -147,6 +147,169 @@ static const s64 link_freq[] = {
> > > > > IMX334_LINK_FREQ,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > +/* Sensor mode registers */
> > > > > +static const struct imx334_reg mode_1920x1080_regs[] = {
> > > > > + {0x3000, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x3018, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x3030, 0xCA},
> > > > > + {0x3031, 0x08},
> > > > > + {0x3032, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3034, 0x4C},
> > > > > + {0x3035, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x302C, 0xF0},
> > > > > + {0x302D, 0x03},
> > > > > + {0x302E, 0x80},
> > > > > + {0x302F, 0x07},
> > > > > + {0x3074, 0xCC},
> > > > > + {0x3075, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x308E, 0xCD},
> > > > > + {0x308F, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3076, 0x38},
> > > > > + {0x3077, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x3090, 0x38},
> > > > > + {0x3091, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x3308, 0x38},
> > > > > + {0x3309, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x30C6, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30C7, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30CE, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30CF, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30D8, 0x18},
> > > > > + {0x30D9, 0x0A},
> > > > > + {0x304C, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x304E, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x304F, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3050, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30B6, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30B7, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3116, 0x08},
> > > > > + {0x3117, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x31A0, 0x20},
> > > > > + {0x31A1, 0x0F},
> > > > > + {0x300C, 0x3B},
> > > > > + {0x300D, 0x29},
> > > > > + {0x314C, 0x29},
> > > > > + {0x314D, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x315A, 0x0A},
> > > > > + {0x3168, 0xA0},
> > > > > + {0x316A, 0x7E},
> > > > > + {0x319E, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3199, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x319D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x31DD, 0x03},
> > > > > + {0x3300, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x341C, 0xFF},
> > > > > + {0x341D, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x3A01, 0x03},
> > > > > + {0x3A18, 0x7F},
> > > > > + {0x3A19, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A1A, 0x37},
> > > > > + {0x3A1B, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A1C, 0x37},
> > > > > + {0x3A1D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A1E, 0xF7},
> > > > > + {0x3A1F, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A20, 0x3F},
> > > > > + {0x3A21, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A20, 0x6F},
> > > > > + {0x3A21, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A20, 0x3F},
> > > > > + {0x3A21, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A20, 0x5F},
> > > > > + {0x3A21, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3A20, 0x2F},
> > > > > + {0x3A21, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3078, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3079, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x307A, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x307B, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3080, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3081, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3082, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3083, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3088, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3094, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3095, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3096, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x309B, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x309C, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x309D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x309E, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30A4, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x30A5, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3288, 0x21},
> > > > > + {0x328A, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3414, 0x05},
> > > > > + {0x3416, 0x18},
> > > > > + {0x35AC, 0x0E},
> > > > > + {0x3648, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x364A, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x364C, 0x04},
> > > > > + {0x3678, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x367C, 0x31},
> > > > > + {0x367E, 0x31},
> > > > > + {0x3708, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3714, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x3715, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3716, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3717, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x371C, 0x3D},
> > > > > + {0x371D, 0x3F},
> > > > > + {0x372C, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x372D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x372E, 0x46},
> > > > > + {0x372F, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3730, 0x89},
> > > > > + {0x3731, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3732, 0x08},
> > > > > + {0x3733, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x3734, 0xFE},
> > > > > + {0x3735, 0x05},
> > > > > + {0x375D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x375E, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x375F, 0x61},
> > > > > + {0x3760, 0x06},
> > > > > + {0x3768, 0x1B},
> > > > > + {0x3769, 0x1B},
> > > > > + {0x376A, 0x1A},
> > > > > + {0x376B, 0x19},
> > > > > + {0x376C, 0x18},
> > > > > + {0x376D, 0x14},
> > > > > + {0x376E, 0x0F},
> > > > > + {0x3776, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3777, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3778, 0x46},
> > > > > + {0x3779, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x377A, 0x08},
> > > > > + {0x377B, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x377C, 0x45},
> > > > > + {0x377D, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x377E, 0x23},
> > > > > + {0x377F, 0x02},
> > > > > + {0x3780, 0xD9},
> > > > > + {0x3781, 0x03},
> > > > > + {0x3782, 0xF5},
> > > > > + {0x3783, 0x06},
> > > > > + {0x3784, 0xA5},
> > > > > + {0x3788, 0x0F},
> > > > > + {0x378A, 0xD9},
> > > > > + {0x378B, 0x03},
> > > > > + {0x378C, 0xEB},
> > > > > + {0x378D, 0x05},
> > > > > + {0x378E, 0x87},
> > > > > + {0x378F, 0x06},
> > > > > + {0x3790, 0xF5},
> > > > > + {0x3792, 0x43},
> > > > > + {0x3794, 0x7A},
> > > > > + {0x3796, 0xA1},
> > > > > + {0x37B0, 0x37},
> > > > > + {0x3E04, 0x0E},
> > > > > + {0x30E8, 0x50},
> > > > > + {0x30E9, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x3E04, 0x0E},
> > > > > + {0x3002, 0x00},
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* Sensor mode registers */
> > > > > static const struct imx334_reg mode_3840x2160_regs[] = {
> > > > > {0x3000, 0x01},
> > > > > @@ -243,20 +406,57 @@ static const struct imx334_reg
> > > > mode_3840x2160_regs[] = {
> > > > > {0x3a00, 0x01},
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > +static const struct imx334_reg raw10_framefmt_regs[] = {
> > > > > + {0x3050, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x319D, 0x00},
> > > > > + {0x341C, 0xFF},
> > > > > + {0x341D, 0x01},
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static const struct imx334_reg raw12_framefmt_regs[] = {
> > > > > + {0x3050, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x319D, 0x01},
> > > > > + {0x341C, 0x47},
> > > > > + {0x341D, 0x00},
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > >
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static const u32 codes[] = {
> > > >
> > > > Just "codes" is a little vague ? What about imx334_mbus_codes[] ?
> > > >
> > > > > + MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10,
> > > > > + MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB12_1X12,
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* Supported sensor mode configurations */ -static const struct
> > > > > imx334_mode supported_mode = {
> > > > > - .width = 3840,
> > > > > - .height = 2160,
> > > > > - .hblank = 560,
> > > > > - .vblank = 2340,
> > > > > - .vblank_min = 90,
> > > > > - .vblank_max = 132840,
> > > > > - .pclk = 594000000,
> > > > > - .link_freq_idx = 0,
> > > > > - .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB12_1X12,
> > > > > - .reg_list = {
> > > > > - .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_3840x2160_regs),
> > > > > - .regs = mode_3840x2160_regs,
> > > > > +static const struct imx334_mode supported_modes[] = {
> > > > > + {
> > > > > + .width = 1920,
> > > > > + .height = 1080,
> > > > > + .hblank = 280,
> > > > > + .vblank = 1170,
> > > > > + .vblank_min = 90,
> > > > > + .vblank_max = 132840,
> > > > > + .pclk = 594000000,
> > > > > + .link_freq_idx = 0,
> > > > > + .reg_list = {
> > > > > + .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_1920x1080_regs),
> > > > > + .regs = mode_1920x1080_regs,
> > > > > + },
> > > > > + },
> > > > > + {
> > > > > + .width = 3840,
> > > > > + .height = 2160,
> > > > > + .hblank = 560,
> > > > > + .vblank = 2340,
> > > > > + .vblank_min = 90,
> > > > > + .vblank_max = 132840,
> > > > > + .pclk = 594000000,
> > > > > + .link_freq_idx = 0,
> > > > > + .reg_list = {
> > > > > + .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_3840x2160_regs),
> > > > > + .regs = mode_3840x2160_regs,
> > > > > + },
> > > >
> > > > Nit: I would keep the existing formats and code in position [0] so
> > > > that if additional modes are added the defaults can be kept in [0].
> > > > Also I usually see drivers listing larger modes first, but that might not be a
> > strict rule.
> > > >
> > > > > },
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -382,7 +582,8 @@ static int imx334_update_controls(struct
> > > > > imx334
> > > > *imx334,
> > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > - ret = __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx334->hblank_ctrl, mode->hblank);
> > > > > + ret = __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx334->hblank_ctrl,
> > > > IMX334_REG_MIN,
> > > > > + IMX334_REG_MAX, 1,
> > > > > + mode->hblank);
> > > >
> > > > I might have missed why is this change related
> > >
> > > Hblank is readonly variable.
> > > If I use __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl function update return error.
> >
> > So it's a separate fix unrelated to the introduction of the new mode ?
> >
> > Probably it never triggered before as we had a single mode so the control
> > was actually never updated, but it's a fix worth a patch of his own maybe.
> >
> > I would make a separate patch before this one or clearly mention in the
> > commit message that also this is changed and why.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -506,10 +707,10 @@ static int imx334_enum_mbus_code(struct
> > > > v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum
> > > > > *code) {
> > > > > - if (code->index > 0)
> > > > > + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(codes))
> > > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > - code->code = supported_mode.code;
> > > > > + code->code = codes[code->index];
> > > > >
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -526,15 +727,20 @@ static int imx334_enum_frame_size(struct
> > > > v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum
> > > > > *fsize) {
> > > > > - if (fsize->index > 0)
> > > > > + int i;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (fsize->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> > > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (fsize->code != supported_mode.code)
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(codes); i++) {
> > > >
> > > > Can we use for (unsigned int i = 0; ... ) now that C99 has been adopted ?
> > >
> > > C99 might be adopted.
> > > But I have not observered no one is started using.
> > >
> >
> > $ git grep -e "for (unsigned " -e "for (int " v6.0-rc2 | wc -l
> > 186
> >
> > > >
> > > > > + if (codes[i] == fsize->code)
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure this is right ?
> > > > If the format code in fsize->code is == codes[1] you will return -EINVAL ?
> > >
> > > I think this will break the for loop, if fsize->code is == codes[1]
> >
> > Yes but before getting to codes[1] you would test codes[0] and if
> > fsize->code != codes[0] you will return -EINVAL
> >
> > Am I reading this wrong ?
> >
>
> Yes, I am wrong
>
> If (codes[0] != fsize->code && codes[1] != fsize->code )
> return -EINVAL
>

Or, if you want to generalize it for future modes:

unsigned int i;

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(codes); ++i) {
if (codes[i] == fsize->code)
break;
}

if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(codes))
return -EINVAL;

Thanks
j

> > > >
> > > > Does the sensor support more formats than
> > > > MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10 and
> > MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB12_1X12 ?
> > > > Because otherwise you could replace the for loop with a simple check.
> > > >
> > > > However support for flip might change the bayer pattern, so it's
> > > > better to keep the loop maybe.
> > > >
> > > > What about centrlize it like you're doing in
> > > > imx219_get_format_code() and use it here ? You can place the helper
> > > > just after the supported mbus codes declaration maybe ?
> > > >
> > > Yes, it is good. But imx334 do not have direct register to do VFLIP.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > - fsize->min_width = supported_mode.width;
> > > > > + fsize->min_width = supported_modes[fsize->index].width;
> > > > > fsize->max_width = fsize->min_width;
> > > > > - fsize->min_height = supported_mode.height;
> > > > > + fsize->min_height = supported_modes[fsize->index].height;
> > > > > fsize->max_height = fsize->min_height;
> > > > >
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > @@ -553,7 +759,7 @@ static void imx334_fill_pad_format(struct
> > > > > imx334 *imx334, {
> > > > > fmt->format.width = mode->width;
> > > > > fmt->format.height = mode->height;
> > > > > - fmt->format.code = mode->code;
> > > > > + fmt->format.code = imx334->cur_code;
> > > > > fmt->format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > > > > fmt->format.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_RAW;
> > > > > fmt->format.ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT; @@ -591,6
> > > > > +797,18 @@ static int imx334_get_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev
> > > > > +*sd,
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static int imx219_get_format_code(struct imx334 *imx334, struct
> > > > > +v4l2_subdev_format *fmt) {
> > > > > + int i;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(codes); i++) {
> > > >
> > > > Ditto, unsigned int and possibily declared inside the for loop
> > > >
> > > > > + if (codes[i] == fmt->format.code)
> > > > > + return codes[i];
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > /**
> > > > > * imx334_set_pad_format() - Set subdevice pad format
> > > > > * @sd: pointer to imx334 V4L2 sub-device structure @@ -606,10
> > > > > +824,21 @@ static int imx334_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev
> > > > > +*sd,
> > > > > struct imx334 *imx334 = to_imx334(sd);
> > > > > const struct imx334_mode *mode;
> > > > > int ret = 0;
> > > > > + u32 code;
> > > > >
> > > > > mutex_lock(&imx334->mutex);
> > > > >
> > > > > - mode = &supported_mode;
> > > > > + code = imx219_get_format_code(imx334, fmt);
> > > > > + if (code < 0)
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + imx334->cur_code = code;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mode = v4l2_find_nearest_size(supported_modes,
> > > > > + ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes),
> > > > > + width, height,
> > > > > + fmt->format.width,
> > > > > + fmt->format.height);
> > > > > +
> > > > > imx334_fill_pad_format(imx334, mode, fmt);
> > > > >
> > > > > if (fmt->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY) { @@ -617,7 +846,7
> > > > @@
> > > > > static int imx334_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > > >
> > > > > framefmt = v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, sd_state, fmt-
> > >pad);
> > > > > *framefmt = fmt->format;
> > > > > - } else {
> > > > > + } else if (imx334->cur_mode != mode) {
> > > >
> > > > Is this change related ? I think it's good as it avoids an
> > > > unecessary update of the controls, but maybe it's not related to this
> > patch ?
> > >
> > > I have updated mode[] array new set of value, Insated of calling
> > > functions simply.
> > > Just added a check the the mode changed then only we need to updated
> > > other parameters Same as imx219 code
> >
> > You're right, we had a single mode before this change :)
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shravan
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > j
> > > >
> > > > > ret = imx334_update_controls(imx334, mode);
> > > > > if (!ret)
> > > > > imx334->cur_mode = mode; @@ -642,11 +871,26
> > > > > @@ static int imx334_init_pad_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > > > struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt = { 0 };
> > > > >
> > > > > fmt.which = sd_state ? V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY :
> > > > V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE;
> > > > > - imx334_fill_pad_format(imx334, &supported_mode, &fmt);
> > > > > + imx334_fill_pad_format(imx334, &supported_modes[1], &fmt);
> > > > >
> > > > > return imx334_set_pad_format(sd, sd_state, &fmt); }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static int imx334_set_framefmt(struct imx334 *imx334) {
> > > > > + switch (imx334->cur_code) {
> > > > > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10:
> > > > > + return imx334_write_regs(imx334,
> > > > > +raw10_framefmt_regs,
> > > > > +
> > > > > +ARRAY_SIZE(raw10_framefmt_regs));
> > > > > +
> > > > > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB12_1X12:
> > > > > + return imx334_write_regs(imx334, raw12_framefmt_regs,
> > > > > + ARRAY_SIZE(raw12_framefmt_regs));
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > /**
> > > > > * imx334_start_streaming() - Start sensor stream
> > > > > * @imx334: pointer to imx334 device @@ -667,6 +911,13 @@ static
> > > > > int imx334_start_streaming(struct imx334
> > > > *imx334)
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + ret = imx334_set_framefmt(imx334);
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + dev_err(imx334->dev, "%s failed to set frame format: %d\n",
> > > > > + __func__, ret);
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* Setup handler will write actual exposure and gain */
> > > > > ret = __v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(imx334->sd.ctrl_handler);
> > > > > if (ret) {
> > > > > @@ -1037,7 +1288,8 @@ static int imx334_probe(struct i2c_client
> > *client)
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Set default mode to max resolution */
> > > > > - imx334->cur_mode = &supported_mode;
> > > > > + imx334->cur_mode = &supported_modes[1];
> > > > > + imx334->cur_code = codes[1];
> > > > > imx334->vblank = imx334->cur_mode->vblank;
> > > > >
> > > > > ret = imx334_init_controls(imx334);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.17.1
> > > > >

Next message: Ido Schimmel: "Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: bcm: Convert drivers to use struct pingroup and PINCTRL_PINGROUP()"
In reply to: Shravan.Chippa: "RE: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx334: support lower bandwidth mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]