Re: [PATCH v3] x86/sgx: Do not consider unsanitized pages an error

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:07:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 8/25/22 01:08, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > However, if the SGX subsystem initialization is retracted, the sanitization
> > process could end up in the middle, and sgx_dirty_page_list be left
> > non-empty for legit reasons.
> 
> What does "retraction" mean in this context?

Rest of the initialization failing or features not detected (-ENODEV).

BR, Jarkko