On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 04:33:47PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
The tracing capabilities for the speaker protection fw enabled via
commit c55b3e46cb99 ("ASoC: wm_adsp: Add trace caps to speaker
protection FW") are not be available on all platforms, such as the
Valve's Steam Deck which is based on the Halo Core DSP.
As a consequence, whenever the firmware is loaded, a rather misleading
'Failed to parse legacy: -19' error message is written to the kernel
ring buffer:
[ 288.977412] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: Firmware version: 3
[ 288.978002] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: cs35l41-dsp1-spk-prot.wmfw: Fri 02 Apr 2021 21:03:50 W. Europe Daylight Time
[ 289.094065] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: Firmware: 400a4 vendor: 0x2 v0.33.0, 2 algorithms
[ 289.095073] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: 0: ID cd v29.53.0 XM@94 YM@e
[ 289.095665] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: 1: ID f20b v0.0.1 XM@170 YM@0
[ 289.096275] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: Protection: C:\Users\ocanavan\Desktop\cirrusTune_july2021.bin
[ 291.172383] steamdeck kernel: cs35l41 spi-VLV1776:01: DSP1: Failed to parse legacy: -19
Update wm_adsp_buffer_init() to *not* report the ENODEV error when the
firmware type is WM_ADSP_FW_SPK_PROT.
Fixes: c55b3e46cb99 ("ASoC: wm_adsp: Add trace caps to speaker protection FW")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
index cfaa45ede916..7514fc03b468 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm_adsp.c
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static int wm_adsp_buffer_init(struct wm_adsp *dsp)
if (list_empty(&dsp->buffer_list)) {
/* Fall back to legacy support */
ret = wm_adsp_buffer_parse_legacy(dsp);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret && (dsp->fw != WM_ADSP_FW_SPK_PROT || ret != -ENODEV))
adsp_warn(dsp, "Failed to parse legacy: %d\n", ret);
Fixing this for a single firmware probably doesn't really make
the most sense, if we are treating buffers as optional these days
I guess really the best solution would be to make this either an
info and slightly rephrase the message or make it a dbg message.
Thanks,
Charles