On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 04:36:20PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
I spent a long time looking at this as well... It's really inscrutable
code. It would be more readable if we just spelled things out in the
most pedantic way possible:
Yeah, the following code looks much better. Ke, would you mind
sending a version like below instead?
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c.
index 1fee702d5529..7e1586bd5cf3 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -158,9 +158,13 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_copen(struct cachefiles_cache *cache, char *args)
/* fail OPEN request if daemon reports an error */
if (size < 0) {
- if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(size))
- size = -EINVAL;
- req->error = size;
+ if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(size)) {
+ req->error = -EINVAL;
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ req->error = size;
+ ret = 0;
+ }
goto out;
}
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs