Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix bind{4,6} tcp/socket header type conflict

[Martin KaFai Lau]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 04:17:49PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> There is a potential for us to hit a type conflict when including
> netinet/tcp.h with sys/socket.h, we can replace both of these includes
> with linux/tcp.h to avoid this conflict.
> 
> Fixes errors like:
> In file included from /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:91,
>                  from progs/bind4_prog.c:10:
> /home/buildroot/opt/cross/lib/gcc/bpf/13.0.0/include/stdint.h:34:23: error: conflicting types for 'int8_t'; have 'char'
>    34 | typedef __INT8_TYPE__ int8_t;
>       |                       ^~~~~~
> In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:155,
>                  from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/socket.h:29,
>                  from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/socket.h:33,
>                  from progs/bind4_prog.c:9:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdint-intn.h:24:18: note: previous declaration of 'int8_t' with type 'int8_t' {aka 'signed char'}
>    24 | typedef __int8_t int8_t;
>       |                  ^~~~~~
> /home/buildroot/opt/cross/lib/gcc/bpf/13.0.0/include/stdint.h:43:24: error: conflicting types for 'int64_t'; have 'long int'
>    43 | typedef __INT64_TYPE__ int64_t;
>       |                        ^~~~~~~
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdint-intn.h:27:19: note: previous declaration of 'int64_t' with type 'int64_t' {aka 'long long int'}
>    27 | typedef __int64_t int64_t;
>       |                   ^~~~~~~
> make: *** [Makefile:537: /home/buildroot/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_gcc/bind4_prog.o] Error 1
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c | 3 +--
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> index 474c6a62078a..6bd20042fd53 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind4_prog.c
> @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
>  #include <linux/in.h>
>  #include <linux/in6.h>
> -#include <sys/socket.h>
> -#include <netinet/tcp.h>
These includes look normal to me.  What environment is hitting this.
I don't prefer the selftest writers need to remember this rule.

Beside, afaict, tcp.h should be removed because
I don't see this test needs it.  I tried removing it
and it works fine.  It should be removed instead of replacing it
with another unnecessary tcp.h.

> +#include <linux/tcp.h>
>  #include <linux/if.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> index c19cfa869f30..f37617b35a55 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bind6_prog.c
> @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
>  #include <linux/in.h>
>  #include <linux/in6.h>
> -#include <sys/socket.h>
> -#include <netinet/tcp.h>
> +#include <linux/tcp.h>
>  #include <linux/if.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>