Re: [PATCH v4] page_ext: introduce boot parameter 'early_page_ext'

[lizhe . 67]

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:23:38 -0700, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 18:27:14 +0800 lizhe.67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> From: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> In 'commit 2f1ee0913ce5 ("Revert "mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init"")',
>> we call page_ext_init() after page_alloc_init_late() to avoid some panic
>> problem. It seems that we cannot track early page allocations in current
>> kernel even if page structure has been initialized early.
>> 
>> This patch introduce a new boot parameter 'early_page_ext' to resolve this
>> problem. If we pass it to kernel, function page_ext_init() will be moved
>> up and feature 'deferred initialization of struct pages' will be disabled
>> to initialize the page allocator early and prevent from the panic problem
>> above. It can help us to catch early page allocations. This is useful
>> especially when we find that the free memory value is not the same right
>> after different kernel booting.
>> 
>
>WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o: section mismatch in reference: early_page_ext_enabled (section: .text.unlikely) -> early_page_ext (section: .meminit.data)
>WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o: section mismatch in reference: early_page_ext_enabled (section: .text.unlikely) -> early_page_ext (section: .meminit.data)

Sorry for introducing this WARNING. I did multiple checks before submitting
the patch but unluckily I didn't trigger this WARNING. Maybe there are some
differences of config in our compilation environment. I have tried gcc 8.3
and gcc 11.2.1.

>
>I did this, but it was lazy - perhaps there's a better-optimized
>combination of section tags.  Please check?
>
>--- a/mm/page_ext.c~page_ext-introduce-boot-parameter-early_page_ext-fix
>+++ a/mm/page_ext.c
>@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ unsigned long page_ext_size = sizeof(str
> static unsigned long total_usage;
> static struct page_ext *lookup_page_ext(const struct page *page);
> 
>-bool early_page_ext __meminitdata;
>+bool early_page_ext;
> static int __init setup_early_page_ext(char *str)
> {
> 	early_page_ext = true;
>_

Thanks for the fix.
I try '__initdata', it triggers another WARNING below.

WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o: section mismatch in reference: memmap_init_range (section: .meminit.text) -> early_page_ext (section: .init.data)

I check the section tags in include/linux/init.h. It seems that we don't have
a better choise. So in my opinion, your patch is the best solution.