[PATCH v2 2/4] pwm: sysfs: Return directly from the for-loop in PM callbacks

[Andy Shevchenko]

There is no need to assign ret to 0 and then break the loop just
for returning the error to the caller. Instead, return directly
from the for-loop, and 0 otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: added tag (Uwe)
 drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index c21b6046067b..1543fe07765b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int pwm_class_resume_npwm(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm)
 {
 	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(parent);
 	unsigned int i;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npwm; i++) {
 		struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
@@ -427,17 +427,17 @@ static int pwm_class_resume_npwm(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm)
 		state.enabled = export->suspend.enabled;
 		ret = pwm_class_apply_state(export, pwm, &state);
 		if (ret < 0)
-			break;
+			return ret;
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int pwm_class_suspend(struct device *parent)
 {
 	struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(parent);
 	unsigned int i;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
 		struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
@@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int pwm_class_suspend(struct device *parent)
 			 * this suspend function.
 			 */
 			pwm_class_resume_npwm(parent, i);
-			break;
+			return ret;
 		}
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int pwm_class_resume(struct device *parent)
-- 
2.35.1