Re: [PATCH v14 04/10] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h and add flags check function

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 06:59:41AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:22:54AM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 11:12 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > In preparation for the patch that introduces the
> > > bpf_lookup_user_key() eBPF
> > > kfunc, move KEY_LOOKUP_ definitions to include/linux/key.h, to be
> > > able to
> > > validate the kfunc parameters.
> > > 
> > > Also, introduce key_lookup_flags_valid() to check if the caller set
> > > in the
> > > argument only defined flags. Introduce it directly in
> > > include/linux/key.h,
> > > to reduce the risk that the check is not in sync with currently
> > > defined
> > > flags.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Jarkko, could you please ack it if it is fine?
> 
> So, as said I'm not really confident that a function is
> even needed in the first place. It's fine if there are
> enough call sites to make it legit.

And *if* a named constant is enough, you could probably
then just squash to the same patch that uses it, right?

If there overwhelming amount of call sites I do fully
get having a helper.

BR, Jarkko