Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,rpmcc: Add compatible for SM6375

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 08:30:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/07/2022 21:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > Add a compatible for RPMCC on SM6375.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > index 9d296b89a8d0..f22febdfdce7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.yaml
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sdm660
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6115
> >            - qcom,rpmcc-sm6125
> > +          - qcom,sm6375-rpmcc
> 
> I am fine with it, although this contradicts a bit
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220705161301.493364-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Would be nice to get Bjorn's opinion/preference on this.
> 

While global consistency is nice, I think we should just stick with
qcom,rpmcc-<soc>, to keep this binding nice and tidy.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof