Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: memory-failure: kill __soft_offline_page()

From: Kefeng Wang
Date: Tue Aug 30 2022 - 05:26:23 EST



On 2022/8/30 15:15, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:34:02AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
Squash the __soft_offline_page() into soft_offline_in_use_page() and
kill __soft_offline_page().

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 1a7d6548ccb2..5b368124956d 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2432,11 +2432,11 @@ static bool isolate_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist)
}
/*
- * __soft_offline_page handles hugetlb-pages and non-hugetlb pages.
+ * soft_offline_in_use_page handles hugetlb-pages and non-hugetlb pages.
* If the page is a non-dirty unmapped page-cache page, it simply invalidates.
* If the page is mapped, it migrates the contents over.
*/
-static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
+static int soft_offline_in_use_page(struct page *page)
{
long ret = 0;
unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
@@ -2449,6 +2449,13 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
.gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
};
+ if (!huge && PageTransHuge(hpage)) {
+ if (try_to_split_thp_page(page)) {
+ pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: thp split failed\n", pfn);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
I've found that this change causes a regression. After the thp is
successfully split here, hpage no longer points to a proper page.
So hpage should be updated to point to the raw error page.

+ hpage = page;
Sorry for the regression,  will update.

Could you update the patch?

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi