Re: [PATCH] soc: sifive: ccache: reduce printing on init

[Zong Li]

Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年8月31日 週三 凌晨1:04寫道：
>
> On 30/08/2022 17:30, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On 30/08/2022 09:26, Ben Dooks wrote:
> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>
> >> The driver prints out 6 lines on startup, which can easily be redcued
> >> to two lines without losing any information.
> >>
> >> Note, to make the types work better, uint64_t has been replaced with
> >> ULL to make the unsigned long long match the format in the print
> >> statement.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
> >>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >> index 46ce33db7d30..65a10a6ee211 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >> @@ -76,20 +76,17 @@ static void setup_sifive_debug(void)
> >>
> >>   static void ccache_config_read(void)
> >>   {
> >> -       u32 regval, val;
> >> -
> >> -       regval = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG);
> >> -       val = regval & 0xFF;
> >> -       pr_info("CCACHE: No. of Banks in the cache: %d\n", val);
> >> -       val = (regval & 0xFF00) >> 8;
> >> -       pr_info("CCACHE: No. of ways per bank: %d\n", val);
> >> -       val = (regval & 0xFF0000) >> 16;
> >> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Sets per bank: %llu\n", (uint64_t)1 << val);
> >> -       val = (regval & 0xFF000000) >> 24;
> >> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Bytes per cache block: %llu\n", (uint64_t)1 << val);
> >> -
> >> -       regval = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE);
> >> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Index of the largest way enabled: %d\n", regval);
> >> +       u32 cfg;
> >> +
> >> +       cfg = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG);
> >> +
> >> +       pr_info("CCACHE: %u banks, %u ways, sets/bank=%llu, bytes/block=%llu\n",
> >> +               (cfg & 0xff), (cfg >> 8) & 0xff,
> >> +               1ULL << ((cfg >> 16) & 0xff),
> >
> > This is just BIT_ULL((cfg >> 16) & 0xff), no?
> > Would be nice too if these were defined, so you'd have something
> > like BIT_ULL((cfg >> SETS_PER_BANK_SHIFT) & 0xff)
> >
> > I do like the cleanup of the uint64_t & cutting down on the prints
> > though :) Again, it'd be nice if you and Zong could collaborate on
> > a combined v2.
>
> I think even BIT_UL() would do here, if someone is going to make a
> cache bigger than 2GiB we'll probably be quite old by then, so v2
> might have the last two values down as %lu.
>

Hi Ben,
Thanks for your suggestion, If you don't mind, I will take this into
my V2 patchset.

> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> >
> >> +               1ULL << ((cfg >> 24) & 0xff));
> >> +
> >> +       cfg = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE);
> >> +       pr_info("CCACHE: Index of the largest way enabled: %d\n", cfg);
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static const struct of_device_id sifive_ccache_ids[] = {
> >> --
> >> 2.35.1
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
>
> --
> Ben Dooks                               http://www.codethink.co.uk/
> Senior Engineer                         Codethink - Providing Genius
>
> https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv