Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] phy: qcom-snps: Add support for overriding phy tuning parameters
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
Date: Wed Aug 31 2022 - 09:12:16 EST
On 8/31/2022 2:05 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:59:13AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
Add support for overriding electrical signal tuning parameters for
SNPS HS Phy.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c | 262 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
index 5d20378..24264ad 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c
@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@
#define USB2_SUSPEND_N BIT(2)
#define USB2_SUSPEND_N_SEL BIT(3)
+#define USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X0 (0x6c)
+#define USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X1 (0x70)
+#define USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X2 (0x74)
+#define USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X3 (0x78)
+#define PARAM_OVRD_MASK 0xFF
+
#define USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_CFG0 (0x94)
#define UTMI_PHY_DATAPATH_CTRL_OVERRIDE_EN BIT(0)
#define UTMI_PHY_CMN_CTRL_OVERRIDE_EN BIT(1)
@@ -60,12 +66,69 @@
#define REFCLK_SEL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
#define REFCLK_SEL_DEFAULT (0x2 << 0)
+#define HS_DISCONNECT_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
+#define SQUELCH_DETECTOR_MASK GENMASK(7, 5)
+
+#define HS_AMPLITUDE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define PREEMPHASIS_DURATION_MASK BIT(5)
+#define PREEMPHASIS_AMPLITUDE_MASK GENMASK(7, 6)
+
+#define HS_RISE_FALL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define HS_CROSSOVER_VOLTAGE_MASK GENMASK(3, 2)
+#define HS_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
+
+#define LS_FS_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
+
static const char * const qcom_snps_hsphy_vreg_names[] = {
"vdda-pll", "vdda33", "vdda18",
};
#define SNPS_HS_NUM_VREGS ARRAY_SIZE(qcom_snps_hsphy_vreg_names)
+struct override_param {
+ s32 value;
+ u8 reg;
Hi Bjorn,
It wasn't immediately obvious to me that reg meant "register value to be
written for the given value specified in DT".
Yes, reg meant the register value to be written corresponding to the
dt_val provided.
I think if you changed "reg" to "reg_val" it would have been.
Sure. Will make this change in the next version.
+};
+
+#define OVERRIDE_PARAM(bps, val) { \
TBH, I don't find this macro to add any value. In order to understand
the tables below I need to look at this macro to know that the two
integers passed to the macro are just stuffed into the array - there's
nothing more to it.
As such I would prefer if you simply wrote:
Sure. I just didn't want to make it look like some random values, but
since these are coming straight out of datasheet and the macro is just
to assign values, I can remove this in the next version.
static const struct override_param hs_disconnect_sc7280[] = {
{ -272, 0 },
{ 0, 1 },
{ 317, 2 },
...
}
+ .value = bps, \
+ .reg = val, \
+}
+
+struct override_param_map {
+ const struct override_param *param_table;
+ u8 table_size;
+ u8 reg_offset;
+ u8 param_mask;
+};
+
+#define OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(table, num_elements, offset, mask) \
+{ \
+ .param_table = table, \
+ .table_size = num_elements, \
+ .reg_offset = offset, \
+ .param_mask = mask, \
+}
Here you could have used the preprocessor to fill in table_size (by just
making it ARRAY_SIZE(table)). But as with OVERRIDE_PARAM I would prefer
if you simply do:
I used ARRAY_SIZE(table) in the code below to indicate the number of
input data elements present for each property.
static const struct override_param_map sc7280[] = {
{
hs_disconnect_sc7280,
ARRAY_SIZE(hs_disconnect_sc7280),
USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X0,
HS_DISCONNECT_MASK),
},
{
squelch_det_threshold_sc7280,
ARRAY_SIZE(squelch_det_threshold_sc7280),
USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X0,
SQUELCH_DETECTOR_MASK),
},
...
}
+
+struct phy_override_seq {
+ bool need_update;
+ u8 offset;
+ u8 value;
+ u8 mask;
+};
+
+static const char * const phy_seq_props[] = {
+ "qcom,hs-disconnect-bp",
The ordering of this list needs to match the order of
override_param_map[] and there's nothing indicating this in the code.
I was considering suggesting that you add a enum/define and do
[SQUELCH_DETECTOR_BP] = "qcom,squelch-detector-bp",
...
and then do the same in the override_param_map array.
>
But I think it will be cleaner if you add a const char const pointer to
override_param_map and just specify these strings in the
override_param_map array.
Each entry will grow by a pointer, but multiple copies of the same
strings (when added in the future) should be combined by the compiler.
IIUC, you want me to remove this array of const char*'s and embed them
in the override_param_map and iterate through it without using this
const phy_seq_props as a reference.
+ "qcom,squelch-detector-bp",
+ "qcom,hs-amplitude-bp",
+ "qcom,pre-emphasis-duration-bp",
+ "qcom,pre-emphasis-amplitude-bp",
+ "qcom,hs-rise-fall-time-bp",
+ "qcom,hs-crossover-voltage-microvolt",
+ "qcom,hs-output-impedance-micro-ohms",
+ "qcom,ls-fs-output-impedance-bp",
+};
+
/**
* struct qcom_snps_hsphy - snps hs phy attributes
*
@@ -91,6 +154,7 @@ struct qcom_snps_hsphy {
bool phy_initialized;
enum phy_mode mode;
+ struct phy_override_seq update_seq_cfg[ARRAY_SIZE(phy_seq_props)];
};
static inline void qcom_snps_hsphy_write_mask(void __iomem *base, u32 offset,
@@ -173,10 +237,147 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode,
return 0;
}
+static const struct override_param hs_disconnect_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-272, 0),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(317, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(630, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(973, 4),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1332, 5),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1743, 6),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2156, 7),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param squelch_det_threshold_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-2090, 7),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-1560, 6),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-1030, 5),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-530, 4),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(530, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1060, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1590, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param hs_amplitude_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-660, 0),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-440, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-220, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(230, 4),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(440, 5),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(650, 6),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(890, 7),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1110, 8),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1330, 9),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1560, 10),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1780, 11),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2000, 12),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2220, 13),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2430, 14),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2670, 15),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param preemphasis_duration_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(10000, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(20000, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param preemphasis_amplitude_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(10000, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(20000, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(30000, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(40000, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param hs_rise_fall_time_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-4100, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2810, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(5430, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param hs_crossover_voltage_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-31000, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(28000, 2),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param hs_output_impedance_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-2300000, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 2),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(2600000, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(6100000, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param ls_fs_output_impedance_sc7280[] = {
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-1053, 15),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(-557, 7),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(0, 3),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(612, 1),
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM(1310, 0),
+};
+
+static const struct override_param_map sc7280[] = {
There's nothing ensuring that the loop below doesn't run off the end of
this array. So when the next platform is added, there's no way to
handle the fact that they might have a different set of properties.
If you add the property name to these elements, that will no longer be a
problem (and you can add a {} entry at the end of the list and check for
this when looping over the elements.
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ hs_disconnect_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(hs_disconnect_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X0,
+ HS_DISCONNECT_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ squelch_det_threshold_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(squelch_det_threshold_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X0,
+ SQUELCH_DETECTOR_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ hs_amplitude_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(hs_amplitude_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X1,
+ HS_AMPLITUDE_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ preemphasis_duration_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(preemphasis_duration_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X1,
+ PREEMPHASIS_DURATION_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ preemphasis_amplitude_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(preemphasis_amplitude_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X1,
+ PREEMPHASIS_AMPLITUDE_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ hs_rise_fall_time_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(hs_rise_fall_time_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X2,
+ HS_RISE_FALL_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ hs_crossover_voltage_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(hs_crossover_voltage_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X2,
+ HS_CROSSOVER_VOLTAGE_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ hs_output_impedance_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(hs_output_impedance_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X2,
+ HS_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_MASK),
+
+ OVERRIDE_PARAM_MAP(
+ ls_fs_output_impedance_sc7280,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(ls_fs_output_impedance_sc7280),
+ USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_OVERRIDE_X3,
+ LS_FS_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_MASK),
+};
+
static int qcom_snps_hsphy_init(struct phy *phy)
{
struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
- int ret;
+ int ret, i;
dev_vdbg(&phy->dev, "%s(): Initializing SNPS HS phy\n", __func__);
@@ -223,6 +424,14 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_init(struct phy *phy)
qcom_snps_hsphy_write_mask(hsphy->base, USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_CTRL1,
VBUSVLDEXT0, VBUSVLDEXT0);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hsphy->update_seq_cfg); i++) {
+ if (hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i].need_update)
+ qcom_snps_hsphy_write_mask(hsphy->base,
+ hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i].offset,
+ hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i].mask,
+ hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i].value);
+ }
+
qcom_snps_hsphy_write_mask(hsphy->base,
USB2_PHY_USB_PHY_HS_PHY_CTRL_COMMON2,
VREGBYPASS, VREGBYPASS);
@@ -280,7 +489,10 @@ static const struct phy_ops qcom_snps_hsphy_gen_ops = {
static const struct of_device_id qcom_snps_hsphy_of_match_table[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-usb-hs-phy", },
{ .compatible = "qcom,usb-snps-hs-5nm-phy", },
- { .compatible = "qcom,usb-snps-hs-7nm-phy", },
+ {
+ .compatible = "qcom,usb-snps-hs-7nm-phy",
+ .data = &sc7280,
Perhaps name "qcom_snps_hsphy_7nm_override_map" or something
along those lines instead of "sc7280"?
My bad, I left it blant. I will rename this appropriately in the next
version.
+ },
{ .compatible = "qcom,usb-snps-femto-v2-phy", },
{ }
};
@@ -291,6 +503,51 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_snps_hsphy_pm_ops = {
qcom_snps_hsphy_runtime_resume, NULL)
};
+static void qcom_snps_hsphy_override_param_update_val(
+ const struct override_param_map map,
+ s32 dt_val, struct phy_override_seq *seq_entry)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Param table for each param is in increasing order
+ * of dt values. We need to iterate over the list to
+ * select the entry that has equal or the next highest value.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < map.table_size - 1; i++) {
+ if (map.param_table[i].value == dt_val)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ seq_entry->need_update = true;
+ seq_entry->offset = map.reg_offset;
+ seq_entry->mask = map.param_mask;
+ seq_entry->value = map.param_table[i].reg << __ffs(map.param_mask);
I would prefer that you include linux/bitfield.h and use:
u32_encode_bits(map.param_table[i].reg, map.param_mask);
instead of writing this yourself (even if it looks correct).
There's a double space after '='.
Regards,
Bjorn
Thanks,
Krishna,
+}
+
+static void qcom_snps_hsphy_read_override_param_seq(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
+ s32 val;
+ int ret, i;
+ struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy;
+ const struct override_param_map *cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+ hsphy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phy_seq_props); i++) {
+ ret = of_property_read_s32(node, phy_seq_props[i], &val);
+ if (ret)
+ continue;
+
+ qcom_snps_hsphy_override_param_update_val(cfg[i], val,
+ &hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i]);
+ dev_dbg(&hsphy->phy->dev, "Read param: %s dt_val: %d reg_val: 0x%x\n",
+ phy_seq_props[i], val, hsphy->update_seq_cfg[i].value);
+
+ }
+}
+
static int qcom_snps_hsphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -352,6 +609,7 @@ static int qcom_snps_hsphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_set_drvdata(dev, hsphy);
phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, hsphy);
+ qcom_snps_hsphy_read_override_param_seq(dev);
phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
if (!IS_ERR(phy_provider))
--
2.7.4