Re: [PATCH] soc: sifive: ccache: reduce printing on init

[Zong Li]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:55 PM Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 31/08/2022 06:22, Zong Li wrote:
> > Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年8月31日 週三 凌晨1:04寫道：
> >>
> >> On 30/08/2022 17:30, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> On 30/08/2022 09:26, Ben Dooks wrote:
> >>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>>
> >>>> The driver prints out 6 lines on startup, which can easily be redcued
> >>>> to two lines without losing any information.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note, to make the types work better, uint64_t has been replaced with
> >>>> ULL to make the unsigned long long match the format in the print
> >>>> statement.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
> >>>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >>>> index 46ce33db7d30..65a10a6ee211 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
> >>>> @@ -76,20 +76,17 @@ static void setup_sifive_debug(void)
> >>>>
> >>>>    static void ccache_config_read(void)
> >>>>    {
> >>>> -       u32 regval, val;
> >>>> -
> >>>> -       regval = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG);
> >>>> -       val = regval & 0xFF;
> >>>> -       pr_info("CCACHE: No. of Banks in the cache: %d\n", val);
> >>>> -       val = (regval & 0xFF00) >> 8;
> >>>> -       pr_info("CCACHE: No. of ways per bank: %d\n", val);
> >>>> -       val = (regval & 0xFF0000) >> 16;
> >>>> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Sets per bank: %llu\n", (uint64_t)1 << val);
> >>>> -       val = (regval & 0xFF000000) >> 24;
> >>>> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Bytes per cache block: %llu\n", (uint64_t)1 << val);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -       regval = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE);
> >>>> -       pr_info("CCACHE: Index of the largest way enabled: %d\n", regval);
> >>>> +       u32 cfg;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       cfg = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       pr_info("CCACHE: %u banks, %u ways, sets/bank=%llu, bytes/block=%llu\n",
> >>>> +               (cfg & 0xff), (cfg >> 8) & 0xff,
> >>>> +               1ULL << ((cfg >> 16) & 0xff),
> >>>
> >>> This is just BIT_ULL((cfg >> 16) & 0xff), no?
> >>> Would be nice too if these were defined, so you'd have something
> >>> like BIT_ULL((cfg >> SETS_PER_BANK_SHIFT) & 0xff)
> >>>
> >>> I do like the cleanup of the uint64_t & cutting down on the prints
> >>> though :) Again, it'd be nice if you and Zong could collaborate on
> >>> a combined v2.
> >>
> >> I think even BIT_UL() would do here, if someone is going to make a
> >> cache bigger than 2GiB we'll probably be quite old by then, so v2
> >> might have the last two values down as %lu.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> > Thanks for your suggestion, If you don't mind, I will take this into
> > my V2 patchset.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I may well post v2 of this tomorrow with the BIT_ULL() suggestions
> from Conor, or even down to BIT_UL() and use %lu as noted.
>

No problem Ben. Could you please also add me in the thread of your v2,
then I can take it and send out my v2 patchset. Thanks.

> >
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Conor.
> >>>
> >>>> +               1ULL << ((cfg >> 24) & 0xff));
> >>>> +
> >>>> +       cfg = readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE);
> >>>> +       pr_info("CCACHE: Index of the largest way enabled: %d\n", cfg);
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>>    static const struct of_device_id sifive_ccache_ids[] = {
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.35.1
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> linux-riscv mailing list
> >>> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Dooks                               http://www.codethink.co.uk/
> >> Senior Engineer                         Codethink - Providing Genius
> >>
> >> https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>